this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
515 points (85.6% liked)

Lefty Memes

4350 readers
466 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I see a lot of people in this thread justifying murder when that's REALLY not what's needed. That will just lead to the only people willing to be cops is maniacs with a gun (who are NOT in short supply) when we really need cops who can take a moment and think.

[–] Prunebutt 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

when we really need cops who can take a moment and think.

Those people are actively filtered out by police.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's not hard to make it through the application process as a compassionate, clever person.

It's just hard to stay employed while butting heads with supervisors that aren't, and the public sends you thoughts and prayers from the sidelines. Sure, they'll riot when evil cops are caught doing evil stuff, but they do absolutely nothing to notice or stop good cops from getting forced out.

Source: My time in law enforcement and my interactions with the public on Reddit where I told my story.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, so because there's a fire we need to pour gasoline on it?

[–] Prunebutt 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's quite what our justice system does: treat violence with even more violence.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So we may as well make it worse.

[–] Prunebutt 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No abolitionist wants to replace the justice system with no system of accountability and societal healing. 🙄

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What would you do to murderers in this system of yours?

[–] Prunebutt 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

After a quick google, I found an abolitionist faq. It's no "world of mine". Abolitionism has quite the history, way before I got into it.

Edit: Here's another text to answer your question

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We need to murder the concept of cops as we know them today. That's the only murder we need. No individual's death will fix a fucked up system, gotta kill the system itself.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People will not have any interest in going without law enforcement for X days/weeks/months/years while you reboot everything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Hill_Occupied_Protest

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, I'd realistically suggest a slow strangle while we build up the alternative in tandem, maybe not "murder", but I opted to use the wording of the poster I replied to.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What would the alternative be? I have never heard of a realistic solution that will be anywhere near the Overton Window and also backed up by data. Again, the last time Americans went without cops (CHAZ), it was a total disaster that "replaced" cops with people who did a far worse job when tasked with the same responsibilities.

I'm not criticizing your use of the word "murder."

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Re: murder, it was more a personal clarification hahah, murder implies a swift execution, versus a slow change.

I do not claim to have the solution. That's outside of my area of expertise. What I can say is that the implementation of policing we have now is failing, and I'd rather move towards something new than spin my wheels now.

I can also say that, with how everything else in our society is organized, our current system of policing is probably the most practical. Any kind of change to it will likely be predicated on many other facets of society changing first or in tandem. I have no illusions that it'll be an easy change.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That sounds like my kind of accelerationism. Eventually cops will have to be dramatically changed.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Eventually cops will have to be dramatically changed.

Is this a quote from 1894 or 2024?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Did I actually incidentally quote something again?

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah... the fed-posting isn't good. However, the current system of policing, and the entire rotten criminal justice system, is a system of oppression, is responsible immense amounts of pain and suffering, and can't be saved by just hiring better people. Cruelty (and upholding hierarchy) is the point.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I maintain that firing bad people and hiring good people is the only realistic way to increase the Good:Bad ratio high enough that many of these problems will evaporate.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee -2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

My guess is its Kremlin propaganda, the same divisive stuff they pushed during the George Floyd riots

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No man, there is plenty of organic distrust of the police here. The whole legal industry is fucked.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure, that's how they work. They find a crack and use a wedge.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not a crack. This is a grand canyon scale chasm. The decline of the opinion of the police closely follows the release, and reporting, of crimes, and other unethical behaviors, of police. When BWC first started, it was a boon to the reputation of police. However, as the general public has been more able to record police themselves, which strips the police's control of the who, when, how, and editing, of the recordings the public sees, the opposite effect started to happen. Now the police are working, furiously, to prevent people from recording them, from publicly releasing recordings of police for various reasons, making it harder, if not impossible, to attain BWC footage, and straight-up stopping the use of BWC. A lot more than that is going on. There has been a deluge of leaks of internal communications, amongst authorities, across the country, that are clearly stating that the cops should continue using unconstitutional practices, and that the government, at least locally, would have their backs. Then there is the leaking of footage from some of the most popular training regimes, and conferences, for police that are way out of line, showing they are clearly being trained to view the entire public as the enemy, and that it is fine to kill people, because the cop going home at the end of the shift, is the most important thing there is. This is just the tip of the iceberg of reasons why the police are losing favor.

The police, the courts, the legislature, are who is responsible for the public outcry against the police. Not Russia, not China, not any foreign power.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You'd have to be a real dumb piece of shit to be a cop. They enforce unjust laws on people for a paycheck and brainwash themselves into thinking the general public is the enemy. They do nothing but ruin people's lives. I'd rather they go after employers and landlords who rob people blind. I'd rather have free access to healthcare than their "protection" I'd rather fend for myself than give up all of my rights in exchange for a false sense of security.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I agree a lot of them are kind of dumb, many of them are power tripping assholes. Doesn't mean people should be ADVOCATING FOR THEIR FUCKING MURDER.

They do nothing but ruin people's lives

Complete horseshit. If you actually think that maybe you're the one who's real dumb.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

They always add additional charges and upgraded charges on people when they arrest them. Destroy property, inflict pain, some places your landlord is required to evict you if you get charged with certain crimes even if you're later find not guilty or plead down to what you actually did. Getting arrested will quite literally ruin your life and that's their literal job.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish. There was that one cop was put away for defending a woman from SA a year after snitching on his fellow officers. His laywer said never heard of jail time for 1st time misdominer. They literally put him in a cell with a known cop killer. Who said naa this is one of the good ones.

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This one time a bad thing happened so now its OK to advocate murder

[–] Prunebutt 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, all the police violence incidents are "individual outliers". /s

[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you think in anything more nuanced than anecdotes and sweeping generalizations? Got anything better than a strawman to respond with?

[–] Prunebutt 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would I think of something better than a strawman when replying to a strawman?

As I said in another post: Cops protect the bourgeois, white-supremacist, colonialist, patriarchal state by enacting violence on the ruled class. That's not a judgement: it's their purpose in the system.

Individuals with bully-like personalities self-select into that job, while decent people are actively shunned. Because group cohesion is more important than "doing the right thing".

Why do you defend cops so much?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no, I'm American and just been walked through the system too many times to believe in it. They're terrorists and calling themselves your protectors.