Technology

58833 readers

6323 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

656

Inside the U.S. Government-Bought Tool That Can Track Phones at Abortion Clinics (www.404media.co)

submitted 13 hours ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

149 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Privacy advocates got access to Locate X, a phone tracking tool which multiple U.S. agencies have bought access to, and showed me and other journalists exactly what it was capable of. Tracking a phone from one state to another to an abortion clinic. Multiple places of worship. A school. Following a likely juror to a residence. And all of this tracking is possible without a warrant, and instead just a few clicks of a mouse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 37 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

As people get ready to vote here in the US, one issue I haven't even heard brought up is the lack of privacy regulations in the US. Do most people not care if the person they're voting for is fine with every corporation selling and sharing personal data?

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago

It's such a non-problem to my family members that if I even suggest it is a problem, I get ignored.

No one cares. It's either nothing anyone values or they figured they never had any privacy to begin with.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Privacy regulations are to the left of the Overton window. The idea that corporations don't have some divinely ordained ownership of our personal data is unthinkably radical.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 15 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Our electoral system results in a choice between two candidates, and both are fine with it.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I was just traveling in the UK and I had this discussion more than once having to explain why our options are always terrible and ignoring issues voters want addressed.

[–] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And more over the electorate is calcified along party lines where the outcomes for either side is perceived as being stark and dire. I suspect this means concerns like these might get stifled even if it is held by both parties.

[–] orbital@infosec.pub 8 points 10 hours ago

I definitely support federal Privacy legislation. Here's at least one take on the issue.

[–] IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

improving the healthcare system is not even a topic of discussion this time around let alone something most people would see as abstract

[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago

You don’t hear about it because the two major parties both oppose them and have nothing to argue about

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 9 hours ago

Omg there's soo many critically important issues that never even get brought up.

Like shutting down the nuclear arsenal, defunding the military and police, establishing a carbon tax, making carbon extraction illegal, establishing UBI. All of these basic policies never even get discussed on mainstream media and it drives me crazy.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

It's not mentioned because only things rich people care about are mentioned on our rich people news programs