this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
776 points (99.5% liked)

RetroGaming

19555 readers
346 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nintendo has been actively taking down YouTube videos that feature its games being emulated or modded, which has sparked significant discussion and concern within the gaming community.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Also, what the fuck is with Japanese law, criminalising modding?

My best guess would be that they're trying to get ahead of the recompiler scene before it catches a bigger foothold. But also, that lumps in the entire rom hacking and fan translation community, which I'm sure they view as perpetuating the piracy of their games.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My best guess would be that they’re trying to get ahead of the recompiler scene before it catches a bigger foothold.

If AI-generating images from copyrighted training material is legal, then generating source code from copyrighted binary code is as well.

That's only true if you're a large corporation doing it.

[–] Prunebutt 11 points 1 month ago

It's probably not about that but rather to destroy the secondary market of modchips and save-file editors in Japan.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Nonetheless, the best thing would be to let those kinds of fans do what they do, because it is free advertising. But no, they'd rather be right than pragmatic, so they shoot themselves in the foot. Meanwhile, if they're so worried that these guys have that kind of serious reach and influence - aren't those the people they shouldn't piss on??

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I don't care what bullshit justification they try to come up with for it; the bottom line is that it violates computer owners' property rights.

It is absolutely unconscionable, ass-backwards, Bizarro-world bullshit to privilege temporary fake Imaginary Property (IP) over and above actual property!