this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
769 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In addition to pumping real estate valuation, it seems like moves like this are a form of cutting workers without having to do layoffs. They know a large number of workers are wont be able to readjust, and will have to quit.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And the ones most likely to quit are ones that feel they have a good chance of easily getting another job due to performance/experience/education, leaving the company with the people unsure and desperate to keep the job.

This surely improves quality, productivity and motivation at the work place, yup yup.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago

My guess is if some companies are willing to have some full time remote positions, they are going to hire from LCOL areas with poor workers rights.

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

That's an actual great point, noted.