this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
935 points (90.9% liked)

solarpunk memes

2843 readers
6 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Hold up... Are centrist people now lumped together with right wingers?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

the problem is that people are called centrists because their major opinion is simply "the status quo is fine", which is effectively just being a conservative but without the active outspoken racism.

The centre party here in sweden meanwhile actively promotes LGBT rights and obvious things like that, they actually have opinions on both sides of the spectrum and a vision for the future, and that vision is one that you might not consider optimal but it's not obviously fucking evil.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But then they're not centrist. If these people are conservative minus active racism, then they're just "RIGHT WING lite."

Why destroy the whole concept of centrism that way?

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago

This issue doesn't stem from the left, it stems from many self-proclaimed centrists actually espousing right wing ideology to the point it has become almost a dogwhistle.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

dunno, but they always do it. ask any woman who dates men and has been single in the past five years.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago

Don't you love how American commenters can't see things like LGBT rights as obvious

Gay rights are human rights. No sane person cares what adults do in private. No sane person cares about who other people hold hands with and kiss

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Centrists are seen as fence sitters because they are ok with the horrible things the system has baked into it, as they are comfortable enough to refuse to take a hard stance against it. Right wingers are people who actively destroy things.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I've been accused of being centrist, usually by American left wingers, on multiple occasions. I don't go about defining my political views with a specific side, much less American sides, but if I am indeed an example of someone centrist, then I can safely say your statement is bullshit.

I could explain why, but I'm not sure if I'll be spending half an hour writing something that nobody is going to read.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago
[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

sometimes writing is a great way to organize your thoughts!

[–] atkion@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

In general maybe not, in these lemmy spaces absolutely.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They often are, because they often are effectively supporting similar policies. I think MLK wrote about this quite well in Letter from a Birmingham Jail. If you haven't read that, it's well worth the 20 minutes.

On a more specific note, many centrist Democrats are actually corporate Democrats, and they're supporting many laws that Republican politicians are also supporting, laws that benefit big businesses at the expense of everyone else in the world.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Here are the two paragraphs you're referencing from the letter he wrote from the Birmingham jail in 1963

I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and that when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress. I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that the present tension in the South is a necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace, in which the Negro passively accepted his unjust plight, to a substantive and positive peace, in which all men will respect the dignity and worth of human personality. Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open, where it can be seen and dealt with. Like a boil that can never be cured so long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago

Oh, so, moderates, not centrists. Yeah.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

From my point of view, virtually all of the people who call themselves "centrists" in U.S. politics are the people who say that both sides are bad, and when you dig into it, they think both sides are bad because they uncritically accept right-wing talking points (read: lies) and framing of the issues.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The problem with US politics is that there are only two sides, two parties. This lumps together all the worst elements of a particular point of view with the more moderate or logical ones.

The extreme elements of the American left are doing the incredibly ironic thing of reintroducing racist concepts, such as segregation, under the idea of it being somehow progressive. State that the slaves brought to the US were bought on African markets that existed centuries before Europeans ever took interest and you'll get a veritable social media lynching mob come after you because it doesn't fit in the idea that anyone with European origins need to feel shame for history long gone. I had an argument in Discord voice chats three times with some American leftists who were adamant that racism was entirely created by white people and that no other ethnic group in the world is capable of being racist (an ironically racist statement). These same kinds of people thought they could educate Mike Pondsmith, the creator of the RPG Cyberpunk, on racism because they wanted him to exclude black characters fram fictional gang called "The Animals" and didn't like the existence of a Haitian gang called "The Voodoo Boys".

In short; uneducated dumbasses who think they can speak for people who they never even met or consulted with, and get incredibly vengeful to the point of ruining people's lives if you call them out on their bullshit. That is why someone can look up at how fucked up American politics is and say. without much difficulty, "Both sides are equally shit. Just choose a flavour".

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

Apparently, yes, at least by some liberals and leftists.

It's clearly an extremist view. Nobody in their right mind would do so much to alienate people who they also want to vote for their party.