taanegl

joined 1 year ago
[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Ron DeLyingPoser.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Which part of "not with the current hardware" didn't you understand? How did those hackers gain access?! WiFi and Bluetooth, as well as some enterprise system shellacked on top of it.

I respect Tom Scott, but that kind of absolutism isn't anything else than a dismissal. But yes, don't trust these IT companies. They are trash, their licenses are trash and their code is trash.

If that's the basis he's going off, he is right, but that doesn't dismiss the point I was trying to make - which completely escaped you.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Like US states were originally against state police, because their local sheriff and local "court systems" did just fine. Can you guess why state police and also inter-state police collaboration became a thing?

If you said to catch freemen and return them to slavery for jaywalking or looking at a white woman the wrong way, you'd sadly be correct.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which is the subposition posed by techie folks a long time. Like where I'm from it's still a paper ballot. But the idea that a paper ballot is that much safer because it's in paper form, but in the end it's the process and the framework around it that does the heavy lifting.

Voting machines can work... just not on an x86 running Windows enterprise lol abort, abort, the milk has soured, I repeat; the milk has soured...

But let's say a well designed RISC-V processor, no accelerators or things that make CPU go vroom vroom but that also introduces the threat of speculative execution and a solid, LTS Linux system with no WiFi, Bluetooth or anything, just a NFC or USB key pair that allows for anonymous voting, whilst also ensuring the integrity of the ballot using identifying measures like cameras in the voting locales and signing in at the entrance before voting.

Again, the process and the framework is the thing here. Even the hardware. Can the current industry handle it? Nope. Will open hardware and open firmware create a new revolution within the use and implementation of computers? I do believe so, and even within voting.

But some Oracle/Microsoft type job? No. Just no. There when you return to the paper ballot.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Funny how convicted felons can have their voting rights taken away, but letting a person who tried to sabotage the voting system to win unfairly run for president again? Suuure!

Not only that, but it's a direct parallel to how the rich have so much more rights than the poor - and the worst part is this guy's fans ARE dirt poor, some may even be felons, who have no right to vote, some of which probably tried to vote illegally because "owning the libs is what matters"... because again, decentralisation, proper vote count, democratic and parliamentary process, this is all bullshit anyways, so let's just game the system!

Like you have to be a special kind of stupid - and I don't mean that in an ableist kind of way, but in a way that this needs to be studied by scientists, because of how absurdly brain-dead it really is.

Like here's a hint: if you set a political precedent where your guy can do it, what's to prevent the other guy from doing it? Does MAGA stand for "make America gullible again"?

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then the question everyone should ask him on Twitter/X is... "Are you an agent of foreign principal?"

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

haha pre-installed vendor garbage go brrrrr

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aw shit, anarchists and tankies inbound.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I think castration should be viable. I mean chemical castration is a viable option for pedophiles. So why not rapists? Oh right. They're protected for this, that and the other reason... especially the rich, so it would only end up with more poor people being castrated... and no one wants that. I mean, what do you feed the machine with? More poor babies, more disheveled and tired cogs, plz. More fuel for the engine.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Next, the breaking of the candlestick makers fingers.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

haha I will find you...

[–] taanegl@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

It's time to play...

...WHO WANTS TO ESCAPE!?!?!!

Each year one lucky contestant gets to escape the machine instead of having their flesh and mind crushed by it. Maybe you'll be the one who gets to not suffer anymore! You're only one out of millions upon millions of people who have the same chance and a dream to not be society's removed!

view more: ‹ prev next ›