sour

joined 1 year ago
[–] sour@feddit.de 27 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I was buying a toslink cable recently and I shit you not, there was a gold plated optical cable...

[–] sour@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago

Phillips Oneblade.

No shit, it's an amazing razor for the pubes. Obviously doesn't cut down to 0 like a wet shave, but it's so much easier and comes really close. And I get ingrown hairs easily if I wet shave down there so it's perfect for me.

It's fast, it's reliably, easy and painless. 100% recommend for ball shaving action!

[–] sour@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Very true. Well, probably not a bad thing to assume people are actually that dumb

[–] sour@feddit.de 9 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Have you been on the internet? Source: personal experience.

Dude, you're on a link aggregator right now, you can't honestly think that you're fact checking every post you read.

[–] sour@feddit.de 20 points 5 months ago

Imagine using dailymail as a reason for why news are factual.

[–] sour@feddit.de -1 points 7 months ago

The post is about true wireless earbuds The comment is about how lemmy makes it about jacks and wired earphones for no reason The counter point is that wired earphones last decades I said that the market for them is already satisfied, while those are the first fair true wireless ones, which is great

Now how is it irrelevant? I seriously don't understand what the problem is, and I also don't know what kind of strawman I apparently made

[–] sour@feddit.de -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The whole thread is about earbuds?! Where do jacks on phones come in all of a sudden?

[–] sour@feddit.de -3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

On true wireless earbuds? How?

[–] sour@feddit.de -5 points 7 months ago (6 children)

So you basically said there's no need for fair wired headphones because cheap 20€ chinese wired ones perfectly serve that market?

Even better that fairphone builds true wireless earbuds with all those fair features, because there is no alternative there already.

[–] sour@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago

In this thread

[–] sour@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yea and guess what, you can't see latency in a YouTube video either.

It's the first device that keeps the latency sub 12ms. Frankly, I never tried it, but it's something no other VR device achieved. I doubt it's fake until proven otherwise, 12ms is almost instant.

Your only argument is "I get sick from VR pass-through". Well, this is a new device that may have solved it, yet you continue to be set on your opinion based on past experiences with other, worse devices.

view more: ‹ prev next ›