socsa

joined 1 year ago
[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not necessarily true though. A person who really wants to get with someone who has turned them down, goes over when they are vulnerable, knowing they are vulnerable, and plies them with alcohol - that's still potentially assault. If both parties are drunk, the presumption is not explicitly rape like it would be if there was such a power imbalance, but it isn't a free pass either.

If your sex partner is intoxicated, it will always raise the stakes, regardless of whether you are also intoxicated. It means you need to be very sure this person wants to sleep with you.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, this gets covered in basic mandatory reporting training. The issue with intoxication is generally the power asymmetry. If there is no asymmetry, there's less of a problem. It isn't a hard and fast rule though. If someone says or implies they don't want to fuck when sober, and you both get drunk and fuck, that's probably not great. Likewise, someone taking advantage of a body mass asymmetry to remain relatively more sober while consuming the same amount of alcohol is definitely still rape.

Basically, if only one person is drunk, there is a strong presumption of assault. If both people are drunk, there is no such presumption, and you'd generally defer to the nature of their relationship outsode of the drinking. So two complete strangers getting sloshed and fucking is typically safe. Two otherwise platonic friends doing the same thing is more of a grey area and you better be sure you are not misreading the situation. You getting drunk with a friend in the hopes they will make a poor decision they wouldn't make while sober is rape.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago
[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You are describing statistically anomalies of automotive maintenance.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The statistical maintenance costs for cars just go up over time, with some pretty big bumps generally every 60k miles or so you put on the car. There are just a ton of straight up wear components on ICEVs from spark plugs to belts to fluids, clutches, seals... if you get unlucky, you end up with a good chance of a semi-major repair or maintenance item every year. If you get lucky, then I guess you post about it on the internet.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

All the big venues near me have moved to non-transferable tickets.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Well adjusted people: See something they do not like. Do not click. Move on.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I mean it's absolutely true that nobody consents to existence. You can choose to ignore this because it is uncomfortable, but it's true. Your parents very selfishly subjected you to almost infinite human suffering.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 110 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Last panel is wrong. Genie would just grant him an MBA from a top tier school

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You pretty much can't. You'd need to run for 6-8 hours per day to burn 8000 calories. For most people who are not professional athletes, that's impossible between work and sleep. To get much beyond 1000 cal/hr output, you need to get into the anaerobic region, which will exhaust you long before you can burn 8000 calories.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That does kind of imply it could need a recharge. These cheaper units don't actually have active monitoring for ice buildup - they just do it on a schedule based on temperature (and sometimes humidity). If you are getting ice buildup, it's either outside the rated performance envelope, or it is not functioning as intended.

view more: ‹ prev next ›