No third-party services
Support for alternative routing
(following link)
alternative routing requires us to use third-party infrastructure and networks we do not control
huh
smollittlefrog
joined 1 year ago
NSFW? (Except if you're a cop of course)
Your Nana when she was young:
Your comment kinda reads like an ad.
Isn't everyone doing that?
Wieso ist es relevant, ob der Artikel von einer KI verfasst wurde, wenn es (bis zum Ende) gar nicht auffällt?
Instead of comparing it to a ball with colour on it, you could compare it to a ball of colour. Which atoms are.
Too much butter and too little butter looking the exact same
I do think it's desirable. It's unnecessary for users to keep track of which tool is best for which purpose if one tool can do it all. There's no reason why one tool wouldn't be able to; even in the worst case it could just automatically choose the best tool to answer your prompt, saving you the trouble of doing so.
A single tool isn't going to meet all those needs yet
I don't know what your definition of "chasing" is, but whatever it may be it seems to be independent of the group that's being "chased".
So in that case you could say "chasing" is bad while a preference is not, completely regardless of whether you're talking about trans people, disabled people or any other group.
Does it say that both the front end and back end are proprietary, or just the back end? I'd be fine with a closed source back end