qjammer

joined 1 year ago
[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

You can install ufw and a frontend for it that lets you block specific processes. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Uncomplicated_Firewall#GUI_frontends It seems KDE already comes with a frontend in the system settings, and there's gufw for gnome/gtk.

[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I recently bought an x86 passive cooled box from Topton, an aliexpress merchant, that was recommended by ServeTheHome, a great youtube channel/blog that reviews all kinds of networking equipment for homelabs. Since it's x86, you can pretty much install anything on it, in my case OPNSense. I recommend you watch some of their videos/read their blogs and see what fits!

[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I read you mentioned firefox. I had a similar experience a while ago, related to this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1704774#c13

[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

The nginx documentation for the ssl preread module has an almost identical example.

[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am running a similar setup to yours. The issue is that only one server block can listen to an address+port pair. You ought to do something like this:

map $ssl_preread_server_name $proxy_backend_router {
        serviceA.example.com    upstreamA:12346;
        serviceB.example.com    upstreamB:12346;
        default $ssl_preread_server_name.invalid_proxy:443;
}


server {
        listen 443;
        ssl_preread on;
        proxy_pass $proxy_backend_router;
}
[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What you should be asking is whether the cables qre the bottleneck in your network or not.

Is there any link that is not negotiating 1Gbps? Do you have devices that could push 10Gbps but the cable is not allowing it? If not, then there's no need to upgrade them.

Unless, of course, if you want to do it just for fun, which is also a legitimate reason 😄

[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds interesting! It could be useful for self hosting apps without the complexity of k8s.

[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks, although I haven't contributed much to the core of ratbag. I only added drivers for the Mars Gaming MM4 mouse, which you're unlikely to have heard of. Thanks should be given to the maintainers, which did a great job in mentoring and reviewing my PR!

[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I love Task! Thanks for your work! I've recently been attempting to add a feature to it related to this issue. It's looking good so far, but still needs a bit of polish. I regularly use Task, and this is the only thing that I feel Task is missing to become the ideal self-descriptive task runner.

[–] qjammer@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not long ago I merged a PR in ratbag, a mouse configuration tool, adding support for the mouse I own. Currently, I'm adding IPv6 support to Concourse, a Continuous Integration server, and adding some features to Taskfile, a Makefile alternative.