perestroika

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] perestroika 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Strange, I can't get the link to open. If I just click the link, (Firefox on Linux) it says "SSL_ERROR_INTERNAL_ERROR_ALERT". However, when I revert to http:// instead of https://, it loads a page saying:

Invalid url! /t/K2Wj4

Can anyone else tell - does it open for you?

[–] perestroika 15 points 3 weeks ago

Why the water isn’t killing the fire?

Could be anything from sodium to calcium carbide to fluorine. :) Sodium makes hydrogen with water, carbide makes acetylene with water, and flouride just oxidizes water by grabbing hydrogen away from oxygen.

If the character's plan is to try fascism next, I think they're into fairly agressive substances. :P

[–] perestroika 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That was a long story, and I was a fool.

I bought a car that had driven an incredibly short mileage, hoping to restore the battery to working order. Being unfamiliar with it, I was unable to find the fault at first, so I bought a second-hand battery separately to test the car. I found the problem, fixed the car, but now had a batttery with a few dead cells left over. After fruitless attempts to find another person in need of many cells, I decided to use them for my house. :)

[–] perestroika 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Do y’all have any ideas/suggestions on how to do this or work on it (slowly)?

I have no idea. I can only say that the first time something happens, involves considerable risk of people being clueless about whatever they are getting into. :)

In aviation, the first will often enough crash and burn, and pilots are lucky if they get back home alive. :)

[–] perestroika 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

While the article takes no solid position about the benefits and harms of alleviating global warming with solar geoengineering, it does correctly point out that discussion and governance of the subject is lacking.

Some hypothetical examples:

Case A:

  • a coastal country experiences increased storm surges, a large percentage of its population stands at risk, it perceives climate change as an existential risk
  • this country decides to engage in solar geoengieering to cool the planet, however its neigbours on higher ground don't perceive a risk from warming, instead they fear that wind patterns could change and deprive them of rainfall
  • they accuse each other of violating each other's rights, start a trade dispute and eventually make war

Case B:

  • lots of people are convinced that efforts to control climate change by reducing carbon output have failed
  • they decide to go for solar geoengineering, but the predicted impact on food production is -10%
  • this affects the poorest of people most adversely, but there is no compensation mechanism
  • cooling the planet succeeds, but results in outbreaks of famine

Case C:

  • lots of people are convinced that efforts to reduce emissions have failed
  • solar geoengineering allows to cool the planet to pre-industrial levels
  • does incentive to reduce emissions disappear now?
  • if the cooling effect is terminated, extremely fast warming may now happen

Myself, I perceive this as a last resort. If reasonable measures don't save the day, this is one of the less reasonable measures that could buy time. I would like people to research this, so that capability would exist. But I would not be easily convinced of the necessity of taking action, as long as alternatives remain.

[–] perestroika 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Summary:

  • lies come out when mouth opens
  • mentally unstable
  • past of criminal behaviour
  • incapable of seeking or adhering to expert advise
  • needs adult help in diplomacy

I keep wondering why he seems to have any chance at all. Guesses:

  • he seems to have access to considerable campaign money, due to oligarchs funding him (broken campaign finance laws)
  • he has taken hostage the right-leaning electorate since they have no alternatives (majoritarian electoral system forcing a two-party landscape)
  • some saw the exchange value of their labour disappear (and foolishly think the extreme right might help)
  • some saw life change, can't adapt (and foolishly think that reactionary politics would help them)
  • some have graduated without any skill of political thought, because nobody taught them
  • some live in social media bubbles

Obviously, society is not well. A healthy society should be able to recognize a confidence artist trying to con them.

[–] perestroika 3 points 1 month ago

Back to farming kale, then. :)

[–] perestroika 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So it's mainly asthma that people develop due to exposure to nitrogen oxide - and treating all the patients puts a considerable burden on society.

Unrelatedly, as a side note, I got curious about Portuguese cooking - for some reason the graphs show that cooking food in Portugal requires a three times higher percentage (30% as opposed to 10%) of overall energy consumption, implying either lower energy use for everything else, or higher energy use for cooking.

I wonder if there's some secret sauce that is only made in Portugal and which is extremely energy-intensive? Or just a case of broken statistics...

[–] perestroika 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean sure, if you’re at such extreme latitudes that you have months of total darkness, then solar will have a problem there. Maybe small modular reactors make sense for those niche applications.

Currently, solar still makes economic sense, but from April to October. Lots of it was built rather fast, now the adoption is slowing since the grid can't accept it everywhere.

Consequently, summer is when oil shale miners rest and prepare for the next season.

Since the goal is to get rid of mining oil shale, big plans exist to install a lot of wind power. Sadly, this has gone embarrassingly slow, and it cannot cover winter consumption, and there is not enough storage.

As a result, some companies and building out storage, but only enough to last a few hours.

...and in the next country southwards, there is a huge gas reservoir that could accept methane, enough to last the whole winter, but nobody has a good enough handle on methanation to renewably produce a considerable quantity and store it there. :o

With regard to reactors, it seems likely that getting one would take 10 years and the local country here doesn't even have legislation built out for nuclear power. They're drafting it. Starting from zero is quite slow.

[–] perestroika 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That's a pretty big gap to cover with spamming more panels. I would venture to guess: this approach would work up to latitude 45 or so.

https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/surface-solar-radiation-d_1213.html

Where I live, in midwinter, the day is 6 hours long. Over here, wind turns more heads than solar. But yes, solar is riduculously quick to install.

[–] perestroika 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Machinery comes is varying width. I would guess a farmer needs to decide at some point - is the priority using a 10-meter wide tool, or is it OK to settle with a 6-meter tool, or even a smaller one.

Basing on that, they'll decide what the clearance between rows of panels should be. From an energy installation viewpoint, the shadow of one row should not cover another row during normal operating conditions. Assuming sun at 30 degrees elevation ("September on latitude 60"), the shadow of a fence that's 1.2 meters tall will be about 1.75 * 1.2 = 2.1 m long. So from an energy generation viewpoint, one can pack things more densely than makes sense for farming.

[–] perestroika 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Since 2021, nearly 4 full years, the world has closed less than 1% of active coal power plants.

Closing will come later, when alternatives are widely available. What renewable energy does currently - at least here - is forcing those plants temporarily out of the market, especially during summer months and windy weather. The plants will exist and stay ready in case of need for well over a decade, maybe even two - but they will start up ever more rarely.

Technically, the deal is: we don't have seasonal energy storage. Short term storage is being built - enough to stabilize the grid for a cold windless hour, then a day, then a week... that's about as far as one can go with batteries and pumped hydro.

To really get the goods one has to add seasonal storage or on-demand nuclear generation. The bad news is that technologies for seasonal storage aren't fully mature yet, while nuclear is expensive and slow to build. There's electrolysis and methanation, there's iron reduction, there are flow batteries of various sorts, there's seasonal thermal storage already (a quarter step in the right direction)...

...but getting the mixture right takes time. Instead of looking at the number of closed plants, one should look at the sum of emissions. To remain hopeful, the sum should stop growing very soon.

 

I feared he would be martyred, when he returned to Russia after getting poisoned by the FSB and helping Bellingcat track down the agents who poisoned him (nobody in power did anything about them). Back then, his life was saved by a pilot deciding to make an emergency landing and a doctor suspecting a neurotoxin.

What finally took his life will be difficult to ascertain due to lack of transparency - a remote location, an extremely authoritarian system, war, politically controlled law enforcement and courts. Still, a day before death, Navalny appeared in court for another potential addition to his already 19-year sentence - in good spirits.

During Navalny's imprisonment, the regime made a sustained effort to break that spirit, issuing a constant stream of disciplinary punishments (a total of 27 times): for not placing his hands behind his back, for incorrectly introducing himself, for uttering a profanity, for failing to clear leaves in the yard, for citing the European Court of Human Rights’ demand for his release, for addressing the guard without using a patronym, and for declining to wash the fence.

They also transfered him to the far north and previously used sleep deprivement against him. I tend to assume that they also killed him, either directly or indirectly.

He was definitely not the perfect politician, but did things which a common politician never dares to do, which suggests having some principles. When they came for anarchists, he didn't forget them, but also spoke for anarchists.

 

Eesti Ekspress on pühendanud artikli Progressiivse Liikumise tegemistele. Kahjuks on nad selle toppinud maksumüüri taha. Kui ma maksumüürist tee ümber leian, kommenteerin all.

The paper Eesti Eksrpress has dedicated an article to the doings of the Progressive Movement. Unfortunately they have paywalled it. If I find a way past the paywall, I will comment below.

 

Summary for the English-speakers: last year Estonia, a country traditionally running on oil shale, has finally produced most of its electrical power from renewable sources. Renewables produced 2.6 TWh while fossils only 2.3 TWh - but the report is needlessly optimistic as 1.2 TWh out of the renewables still involved burning stuff (waste, wood chip and other biomass).


Verstapostist on mööda saadud, aga tegelikkus ilusate arvude taga on, et pool meie "taastuvenergiast" emiteerib süsihappegaasi. Siiski on ka see parem kui mitte midagi. :)

30
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by perestroika to c/meta
 

Background: yesterday, there was heated discussion in the thread "military-industrial complex is a supervillain of causing the climate crisis" (link).

Among others, the thread creator posted a comment to the Guardian article "The climate costs of war and militaries can no longer be ignored", commenting it thusly:

If you want more context or won’t take my word on how militarism will kill is all, you can read this article.

I replied, a copy of my reply is below for your judgement. My reply got moderated by someone with the reason "Comment does not address intent of original post and promotes weapons industry / war in Ukraine."

I think my comment both addressed the topic, did not promote the weapons industry but helping Ukraine defend itself (ironically, tools for military self-defense come from the weapons industry) and did not promote the war (in fact, I noted that war is expensive, resource-intensive and stupid), but did explain the dynamics of war and revolutions.

I consider this moderator misconduct, likely motivated by their political views - and have asked a server administrator to talk with the moderator involved, to ascertain if they can refrain from using moderator powers as a political club to hit people, or to secure their demotion from a moderating role.

The removed post, for your judgement:


The article is fine, and I second the recommendation to read it, but from the article to the slogan you present, things do not follow a logical path.

Yes, war is both an incredibly expensive activity (diverting money that could be used) and a resource-intensive activity (the money goes into actual materials that almost surely destroy something or get destroyed) and an incredibly stupid activity (and it can snowball)...

...but the problem is that successful unilateral disarmament during a war tends to result in a situation called "defeat". If the defeat is not an attack being defeated, but defense being defeated, that is called a "conquest". Now, letting a conquest succeed has a historical tendency of the conqueror having more experience at conquest, and more resources to conquer with... which has, several times in history, lead to another conquest or a whole series of conquests. A regional war in Ukraine resulting in Ukraine being taken over by Russia has a high probability of producing:

  1. a bigger regional war later, in which Russia, using its own resources and those of Ukraine, proceeds to another country, gets into a direct conflict with NATO and then indeed there is a risk of a global war
  1. an encouraging effect after which China, noting that international cooperation against the agressor was ultimately insufficient, and deeming itself better prepared than Russia, decides that it can take Taiwan with military force

However, a war ending with inability to show victory tends to produce a revolution in the invading country. For example, World War I produced a revolution in Russia and subsequently a revolution in Germany, with several smaller revolutions in between, empires collapsing and a brief bloom of democracy in Europe, before the Great Depression and the rise of fascism ate all the fruits. The Falklands War produced a revolution in Argentina. The Russo-Japanese war produced the 1905 near-revolution in Russia.

It is better for Ukraine to not get conquered. It is better for Russia to be unable to conquer Ukraine. That result is also better for everyone around them. It's even better globally because it sets a precedent of large-scale cooperation defeating an agressive superpower, discouraging agressive superpowers from undertaking similar wars until memory starts fading again.

Unfortunately, until we see indications that Russian society is getting ready to stop the war (this could involve starting negotiations on terms palatable to Ukraine, a change of leadership, a withdrawal, a revolution, etc)... the path to achieving that outcome remains wearing out the agressor: producing enough weapons and delivering them to Ukraine.

Ultimately, both sides in a war wear each other down. The soldiers most eager to fight are killed soonest. The people most unwilling to get mobilized or recruited, and soldiers most unwilling to fight - they remain alive. If they are pressed forever, some day they will make the calculation: there are less troops blocking the way home than in the trenches of the opposing side. After that realization, they eventually tend to mutiny. Invading troops tend to do that a bit easier than defending troops, because they sense less purpose in their activity. In the long run, if nothing else happens, that will happen. There is just (probably, regrettably) no particularly quick shortcut to getting there.

3
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by perestroika to c/perestroika_pw
 

Läti anarhistid korraldavad raamatulaada. Sellest kirjutab Soome anarhistide portaal "takku.net". / Latvian anarchists are holding a bookfair in spring. The Finnish anarchist portal "takku.net" reports about it.


We announce the 1st Anarchist Bookfair in Riga 24-26 May 2024

We are going to continue the tradition of Anarchist bookfairs which have been held in Tallinn, Stockholm and London. We invite all the Anarchist and Antiauthoritarian publishers to present and sell their books, magazines, newspapers, cartoons, etc and everybody interseted to spend the weekend with us, take part in discussions and seminars. The event is open to everybody and no prior registration is required. The details of the programme will come later.

If you want to sell/present your printed matter, please, write to rigabooks@riseup.net We have a limited number of tables/stalls, order them in advance. The deadline for booking is May, 1 2024. We are going to hold a special round table discussion for Anarchist publishers, bloggers, writers, artists and translators. Let us know if you want to take part.

If you want to make a presentation/lecture/workshop/concert you are most welcome. Please write to rigabooks@riseup.net The deadline is 23.04.2024

When: 24-26 May 2024

Where: Riga, Latvia

Riga, the capital city of Latvia, is situated at the Baltic sea and it is an ideal meeting place for all those interested from the East and the West. Latvia has a glorious anarchist history dating from 19 century and of anarchist and libertarian socialist print in various languages, including Latvian, Russian, Yeddish. Latvia has beautiful nature and May is the best time to come, when there are not so many tourists and it is already warm. Latvia has very rich history of brewery and one of the best beers in Europe.

 

For English speakers: electricity consumers in Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are having "interesting times" at the moment. A sudden intrusion of arctic air has resulted in very low temperatures (down to -40 C in northern Finland) and resultingly, electricity prices are super high. In addition, one energy block in the Forsmark NPP is down in Sweden. The Finnish grid administrator has thus advised people to use electricity sparingly.

The unavoidable blame game of "why" will unavoidably follow. To state the most obvious, an excess of weather is excessive. :) But the pricing algorithm of Nord Pool (the common electricity exchange of Northern Europe) is such that the highest asker whose services are needed "makes the price" for everyone during that hour. Whether that is reasonable, is not obvious (and not trivial to prove or disprove).

However, the region also has a definite lack of energy storage. Lack of storage means that when a bad day comes, instead of graceful rise, some operators are warming up big power stations which use inefficient fuels from a stone-cold status, only to let them cool down tomorrow. Such activity costs the consumer a big penny.


ERR kirjutab sellest, mis parasjagu turul toimub. Eestis saab nautida enamuse reedest elektrit hinnaga 0.8 € / KWh, tipptundidel aga 1.8 € / KWh. Soomes on võimalik itkeda hinnataseme juures 2.3 € / KWh. Kuidas sellist nalja ära hoida saaks? Või ei saagi?

Minu hinnangul - ikka saab. Olemas peab lihtsalt olema mingeid vähegi normaalse kütusega töötavaid varuvõimsusi, mille liinile toomine on natuke kergema klassi ülesanne kui mäe soojaks ajamine. :)

Olemas peab olema ka salvestavaid võimsusi. Siis hakkab hind kerkima sujuvalt, sedamööda kuidas ilmaennustust lugenud salvestajad päikeselisel päeval oma energiasalvi täidavad ja odavamad varus seisnud jaamad mitu päeva kuumana käivad (samuti selleks, et pahal päeval kõik energiasalved täis oleks)... selle asemel et ühe meeletu lõpuspurdi käigus üheks meeletuks päevaks ka kõige raiskavam tootmisseade üles kütta... ja taas jahtuda lasta. Selline tegevus lihtsalt peabki olema väga ebaefektiivne.

Hind tõuseks ikka, aga salvestusvõimsuste leidumisel sujuvamalt. Tervislikuma tootmisvõimsuste segu korral mitte nii järsult. Tegemist on lahendatava probleemiga. Lahendus võib olla kas tehniline (jättes Nordpooli veidi kummaline algoritm samaks) aga võib ka peituda turu reeglite muutmises. Kas viimane turule mahtunud pakkuja ikka peab "tegema hinna kõigi jaoks"?

Minu jaoks teoreetiline küsimus, kuna eilne päikesepaiste täitis kõik omad kõik varud üle ootuste.

Häid külmapühasid.

 

A topic about some pointless reddit, please ignore. / Teema mingi mõttetu redditi kohta, palun eirake.


Hiljuti oli jälle võimalik näha Eesti redditit selle uues hiilguses. Kuna see oli mitmes kord, siis kannatus katkes - saatsin olukorra põhjustajad ning probleemi eirajad iga ilmakaare suunas ja tulin ära.

Diagnoos:

  • arvestatav kogus totalitaarsuse ihalejaid
  • kogunevad nagu kärbsed teatud teemadesse
  • seal teemades on neil lokaalne enamus
  • teevad üleskutseid vägivallale ja totalitaarsete ideede toeks
  • üldine populatsioon ei viitsi nendega tegeleda, kuna on meelt lahutamas
  • lisaks on provokaator reeglina "omade poolel", keskmise redditori aju tõrgub siinkohal
  • reeglid ütlevad, et "meil on selleks moderaatorid"
  • kuna mind võidakse bännida, järgin reegleid ja ei pea nendega kodusõda
  • paraku, moderaatorid ei tegele
  • ja Redditi adminid ei loe eesti keelt

Kui eelnevad tingimused on täidetud, siis ongi valmis kasvulava, kus liberaalid toidavad metsast leitud haiget fašismi - ja kui anarhist ütleb, et viige fašism metsa tagasi, siis anarhist on liiga radikaalne ja liberaalid ei vii - hoiavad ja toidavad edasi, küllap kuni hammustama hakkab.

Omaette fenomen on silmakirjalikkus ja musta valgeks rääkimine. See on seal kah kõrgelt arenenud.

Toda keskkonda ühelegi anarhistile poliitiliseks aruteluks ei soovita. Mudaaugus, kus pooltel on juba mudaplönn peos, ei saa arutleda, vaid muda loopida.

 

This article is about fixing, but with a twist - it's about fixing trains that their manufacturer sabotaged. :D

In Poland, it took the hacker crew "Dragon Sector" months of work to find a software "time bomb" that was sabotaging "Impuls" trains manufactured by Newag, once their maintenance was handed over to another company.

Let this be a reminder to everyone about closed source technology and critical infrastructure.

29
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by perestroika to c/offgrid
 

Living off grid often correlates with poorly accessible locations - because that's where the infrastructure is not.

On certain latitudes, especially near bodies of water, especially in remote locations - do not ask who the snow comes for - it always comes for you (and with a grudge). So, what ya gonna do?

Over here, a tractor being incomplete (it is great folly to go into winter with an incomplete tractor), snow is handled by an electric microcar. Since the microcar is made of thin sheet metal and plastic, it cannot carry a plow... but the rear axle being solid steel, it can pull one.

The plow is one year old, and was previously pulled by a gasoline car. It is made of construction steel: 8 mm L-profiles shaped like a letter A with double horizontal bars. The point of connection on top ensures it doesn't lift too much while plowing. It's currently fixed with an unprofessional and temporary C-clamp (there will be an U-bolt soon). It is pulled with a chain.

If snow is heavy, the L-profiles lift the plow on top of snow, and you have to plow the same road many times. Sometimes it veers off sideways. Generally, you have to catch the snow early with this system - if you're late, you're stuck. :)

Not many advantages, but dirt cheap. Don't go plowing public roads with such devices - it is nearly invisible to fellow drivers, and cops would get a seizure.

 

Some Chinese researchers have found a new catalyst for electrochemically reducing CO2. Multiple such catalysts are known, but so far, only copper favours reaction products with a carbon chain of at least 2 carbons (e.g. ethanol).

The new catalyst requires a specific arrangement of tin atoms on tin disulphate substrate, seems to work in a solution of potassium hydrogen carbonate (read: low temperature) and is 80% specific to producing ethanol - a very practical chemical feedstock and fuel.

The new catalyst seems stable enough (97% activity after 100 hours). Reaction rates that I can interpret into "good" or "bad" aren't found - it could be slow to work. The original is paywalled, a more detailed article can be found at:

Carbon-Carbon Coupling on a Metal Non-metal Catalytic Pair

Overall, it's nice to see some research into breaking down CO2 for energy storage, but there is nothing practical (industrial) on that front yet, only lab work.

 

To make no excessive claims, I have to admit I burnt a fair bit of wood during the night. In the morning however, around 9 o'clock, the solar fence (nominal power 2400 W) was giving 600 W and steaming vigorously. By 10 o'clock, it had thawed and gave 940 W. Later, other panel arrays took over and wattage decreased. The energy was used to run a heat pump.

P.S. Knowing that server resources aren't infinite, I hosted the image externally, I hope that hosting on "postimages.org" works smoothly.

11
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by perestroika to c/abolition
 

The short war which Azerbaijan waged against Armenian-populated Karabakh after a months-long blocade is over (Armenian separatists lost, and will likely get ethnically cleansed out of the region)...

...but in the aftermath, it's worth pointing out that several high-profile Azeris did speak against their government starting a war - and were repressed.

The most worrisome case is the chairman of the confederation of trade unions, Afiaddin Mammadov. A provocateur who had previously injured himself threw a knife at him, and cops arrested him immediately after that, claiming he had injured the provocateur.

view more: ‹ prev next ›