ojmcelderry

Yo ho, yo ho!

Hello 👋🏻 fellow AdGuard user here. This extension never gets much mention – people seem to prefer AdBlock and uBlock Origin for whatever reason – but I'm very happy with AdGuard and have used it for years now.

I don't have any issues reading articles online. I wonder if we're subscribed to different filter lists.

I believe there's a filter called "anti-adblocker" or something – I would suggest you enable that if you don't already have it enabled. My understanding is that it'll block scripts that check if you have an adblocker – resulting in fewer of those "please disable your adblocker" banners.

Is this really "world news"? 😕

I mean, what's new? We've known for years that companies are collecting our personal data online.

One really practical way to learn some new recipes is to use a recipe box service like HelloFresh or Gousto.

They deliver a box with all the required ingredients and easy to follow recipe cards.

For anything that you make & enjoy, you can keep the recipe card and cook it again using store bought ingredients.

These recipe boxes regularly have deals and promotions (e.g. 60% off, refer a friend, etc.) so it doesn't have to be too expensive.

Or if you don't want to order one at all, it's worth knowing that HelloFresh make all their recipes available online for free. So you can download and print off any that you like the sound of, without ever even ordering one of their boxes.

looking forward to finding a proper solution

To the contrary, I think you have a solution in search of a problem.

Your solution is smart contracts, and you're asking us if we agree that your cloud storage example would be a good use case for that solution.

Yep 🤦🏻‍♂️

This isn't even about AI. Regular search engines will also provide results reflecting the thing you asked for.

Does anybody else find Tom Scott annoying?

I love channels that deep-dive into the details of things, etc. But I've always found Tom to be so smug and patronising.

Is it just me?

In the UK it's a "builders' bum"

They can still reject the proposal. Just because they're built upon Chromium, doesn't mean they need to utilise or retain every feature Google adds to it.

This is worse than the time Elon Musk bought Twitter and ran it into the ground.

To be honest, I think whichever approach you take is unlikely to have a significant effect on how much energy your website uses overall.

For example, servers in datacentres are very powerful and are able to run more than one thing at once. So if you were hosting your own Lemmy/Mastodon instance, there'd be no reason why you couldn't also host a standalone website on that same server. The difference in energy usage would be negligible.

In contrast, you could argue that Lemmy is less efficient than a straightforward static website because the content of your blog posts will inevitably end up being federated to many other instances. That means multiple copies of your blog will be transferred between multiple servers and stored on multiple hard drives, etc. Whereas a static website lives in one place and doesn't end up using so many resources.

At the end of the day, whichever you choose will likely have very little impact. So I wouldn't worry too much about your blog's green credentials.

I'm saying this as somebody who is pro protecting the environment, but also pro prioritising our efforts in the places they'll have greatest impact. You'll probably have a bigger impact by walking to the store instead of driving.

Agreed. News about X is not news about technology.