mambabasa

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] mambabasa -4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

No, you're just making shit up. People who already decided to vote for Harris won't change their minds at a few memes. That's not how anything works. You're ascribing meaning to actions that simply cannot represent those meanings. Memes aren't an abstention campaign.

[–] mambabasa -4 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

I don't even know who Jill Stein is, asshole. Now you're just making shit up.

And if that's my plan, then obviously it's a pointless and doomed endeavor. I know people won't listen to me. I know I can't influence the American election as a non-American in not-America. Yet anarchists must say what only anarchists can say. And that is why I speak out against genocide.

[–] mambabasa -5 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I have never argued for abstention. Stop putting words in my mouth. And do you honestly think, I, a non-American in not-America, can affect the most influential election in the world? Get over yourself. I know people aren't listening to me. But anarchists must say what only anarchists can say.

[–] mambabasa -2 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

What's my plan? To remind people what they're voting for? To remind people voting isn't enough? That plan? You're the one who has been belittling me in the past several days over basic principled positions on opposition to genocide. You willfully and freely provide ideological cover for Harris. You simply are not entitled to do that in anarchist spaces. That's literally all there is.

[–] mambabasa -3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why are you so entitled to soapbox your anti-anarchism, liberalism, electoralism, and ideological cover for genocide in our space when you can shit the floor in literally almost every other Lemmy? Go to those other communities; they'll welcome you. No, you're not entitled to it. Go pound sand.

[–] mambabasa -5 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

You're correct! But defending Harris and her program is a different choice. You can vote, but you don't need to CHOOSE to defend Harris, you don't need to CHOOSE to defend her program, you don't need to CHOOSE to provide ideological cover for genocide. Vote if you want, but defending Harris is a different choice from voting. And doing this in an anarchist space? Why in our space? Can't you do that in the hundreds of other Lemmy communities? Don't use our space to soapbox. Do the ideological cover for genocide elsewhere, thank you very much.

[–] mambabasa -4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Defending the shitty choice is defending the program of your vote. You can vote for the lesser evil, but do you need to defend the evil? Do you need to justify the evil? No. Just vote. You don't need to defend or justify evil.

[–] mambabasa -5 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

Do you have any experience organizing? Because in my experience, booting out liberals from shitting in our physical spaces is a justified thing to do. Why not digital? Are they silenced? They still have literally almost every other Lemmy to spout their electoralist evilism. They are not censored or silenced from the public, just removed from anarchist spaces.

[–] mambabasa -3 points 2 weeks ago (31 children)

Anarchism doesn't mean free speech for anti-anarchists. Simple as. We welcome debate and dissent in our ranks, but don't lay down welcome mats for those who hate us and our program. Please tell me why you should feel entitled to soapbox in our space when literally almost every other Lemmy is devoted to the Harris cause? Soapbox somewhere else. I was just taking out the trash.

[–] mambabasa -4 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

No it wasn't. They were justifying and defending Harris and defending voting for Harris. Anti-anarchists don't get to use anarchist spaces to push anti-anarchist talking points. They have literally almost every other Lemmy instance to push their voting agenda, why should they use ours?

36
Just look away. (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 
-23
Vote Harris (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 
-39
Vote democrat (slrpnk.net)
submitted 3 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 
-8
submitted 3 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 
 

Liberals would think that people being anti-genocide will cost Harris the election, but do you honestly think I, a shitposter, and A FILIPINO IN THE PHILIPPINES, will have ANY discernible effect on the most powerful and influential election in the world? Get over yourself.

What will have an effect on the election? Supporting a genocide. If and when Harris loses, y'all will blame Muslims, the left, and Palestinians for not supporting Harris, but do you honestly think ANYTHING the left does really matter? It doesn't. The left has been inert for almost a century now. What will matter? Supporting a genocide.

Stop blaming people with a conscience for what will be the biggest political disaster in history (regardless of who wins). Start blaming your own politicians for supporting genocide thus losing their support base. Politicians have a job, and that job is being responsive to their constituency. Or at least that's what liberalism tells us about politics. Or you can wake up and see that the politicians were never "your" politicians because they were never accountable to you.

The significance of the individual ballot is the sophistry of liberal ideology, yet in the most powerlessness of the ballot contains the only move the alienated voter can accomplish. I will not blame people for not voting for more Palestinian death. In their powerlessness, that is the only form of politics left available to them.

And don't kid yourself you're voting for harm reduction. Harris stands for the same migrant concentration camps, the same transvestigations, the same trans genocide, the same genocide of Palestinians, the same cop cities, the same imperialism, the same ecocide. Literally every day you see a new article of Harris moving rightward. You're not voting for harm reduction, you're voting for "new normal" and your own personal comfort. It doesn't matter if Trump is worse if the worse is already the new normal. At least don't lie to yourself and others on that matter.

If you don't like your powerlessness, might I suggest Netayahu's message to the Lebanese people which said that they must overthrow Hezbollah or face genocide by Israeli bombs. You Americans must overthrow your government or face genocide by your own government. The concentration camps are already open (and stayed open by the grace of Biden!), and Trump or Harris, it already has your name on it.

-3
Funny how that works (self.notvoting)
submitted 3 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 

-9
Gaza (self.notvoting)
submitted 3 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 

-37
As commander in chief (self.notvoting)
submitted 3 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 

-21
It's your choicr (self.notvoting)
submitted 3 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 

-32
not a deal breaker (self.notvoting)
submitted 3 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/notvoting
 

 

NBC Politics: "I believe we should follow the law," Kamala Harris says when asked by Hallie Jackson if transgender Americans should have access to gender-affirming care.

I thought y'all were sacrificing millions of Palestinians and migrants and Black people for harm reduction, but your queen won't even commit to the god damn harm reduction.

26
Ostrom’s 8 Rules of the Commons for Anarchists (usufructcollective.wordpress.com)
submitted 4 weeks ago by mambabasa to c/anarchism
 
  1. Participants know they are part of a group and what the group is about (Wilson, 2016).
  2. Agreements for sharing and at times rotating labor/work and implementation of decisions as well as for sharing the fruits thereof (Kropotkin, 1906, Sixth Commission of the EZLN, 2016, Ostrom, 2021, Usufruct Collective, 2022). People can co-create a cornucopia where there is more than enough for all or otherwise agree to specific ways of distributing less abundant fruits of re/production according to needs.   
  3. Direct collective decision making by participants through deliberation. For there to be self-management of each and all, there must also be mutual non-domination. By extension, community assemblies related to the commons should utilize direct, participatory, and non-hierarchical forms of democracy (Bookchin, 2005b).  
  4. Organizational transparency that allows participants to mutually-monitor the commons (Atkins, Wilson, Hayes, 2019). This can happen through the process of co-managing and interacting with the commons, collective action, living in community with others, relevant accounting/calculation as needed, and availability of relevant information to participants. 
  5. Graduated defense against domination and exploitation such as: informal social disapproval, self-defense and defense of others as needed, and recourse to expelling someone from a particular collective (through deliberation, assembly, and due process) in response to the most extreme violations of the commons and freedoms of persons (Boehm, 2001, Ostrom, 2021, Usufruct Collective, 2023).  
  6. Good-enough conflict resolution such as: people talking directly to each other, mediation to find out how to move forward, dispute resolution to resolve disputes, restorative justice and transformative justice processes for people to repair harm and transform causes thereof, and organization-wide assembly when the conflict is in regards to organizational form and content. (Kaba, 2019, Usufruct Collective, 2023). 
  7. Communities and participants need sufficient autonomy to organize. 
  8. The use of co-federation and embedded councils. Community assemblies can co-manage inter-communal commons in a way where policy-making power is held by participants and assemblies directly (Bookchin, 1992, Ocalan, 2014). This enables self-management and mutual aid within and between communities as well as inter-communal management of the commons. Community assemblies can utilize mandated and recallable councils and rotating delegates to implement decisions within the bounds of policies made by community assemblies directly (Bookchin, 1992, 2007, 2018). 
view more: ‹ prev next ›