dillekant

I've got New Balance ones which are fairly cheap but have lasted me a good few years. Won't last for life but definitely years.

OK a bit of a rant from me but here I go:

Tim could easily see a smaller cut from Valve for a big game and say "yeah that's great sign me up" but he doesn't. He literally says "You should support the smaller players rather than the large ones". He's arguing to give a better rate to struggling developers rather than the successful ones. That's what the COO says "umadbro" to. Honestly, that's enough for me to really reconsider buying new games from Steam.

The issue is: This is exactly how Sweeney talks to people on Twitter. There was a particularly good reply to him once, which basically went: I agree with you and support your principled stance, but I can't trust you because you are such a troll.

This is the problem. I truly believe Sweeney is a good person, and he actually wants more open markets not just for Epic but for everyone. Yes, he ships Unreal which smaller devs use and a sale for them means a sale for him, but really you don't lean into things like this unless you actually want to democratise making games as a principled stance.

But he can just be such a jerk that people just don't like talking to him or dealing with him or his companies. It's frustrating to be honest, because he can be such a voice for good.

Ribbit!

I feel like this post has devolved into nomenclature. My intent was not to tut tut people for using the wrong word, it was to say that Civil Disobedience is actually quite powerful, and we can use it to enact change at the government level.

As someone else said, that's "passive resistance" and it's fine and good. Just being a pirate is fighting the good fight.

"Having sex with your bully's mum is passive resistance; Having sex with your bully's mum while looking your bully in the eye is civil disobedience".

Wikipedia:

Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws, demands, orders or commands of a government (or any other authority).

The "refusal" part is where you challenge the authorities.

The "professed" part is where you do it publically.

The "media attention" is the bit where you are not an idiot. If no one knows you went to jail, that's just willfully breaking the law.

My friend, you seem to be too young to have gone to a leech-n-lan. Those were indeed the days... yarrr...

I think it's the other way around. Civil Disobedience is a type of passive resistance, but I think we're both saying the same thing here. You don't just have to do civil obedience to have passive resistance, and other techniques are equally valid. The two even go well together.

For example if a small number of people do a civil disobedience, you can quietly seed as well, so even if they're all jailed the seeding will continue.

+1. I was giving an example but you really need everyone involved to sit down and think through the way things are going to work. Every successful act of civil disobedience is thoroughly planned out.

+1, it's fine to just share.

Also I guess a finer point: Non-commercial filesharing is not piracy, we just call it that (somewhat) ironically because this is how the industry wants to label us. Almost all the laws imply a profit being made.

You must do it "loudly". You have to seed in front of the prime minister, or get the news to cover you doing it, and put your real name out there.

He's me on a good day, maybe my best day. One thing is for sure, I never met him but he's our people.