aroom

joined 2 years ago
[–] aroom@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

of course, but in this situation it's pretty simple. how do you act with the choice given.

[–] aroom@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

no. the attitude that is not useful is to make up arguments to justify our choices.

we know the fact. we choose to act on them or not. and this is the same for a lot more topics than veganism.

don't return the responsibility on the people who act to diminish suffering and waste of ressources. vegetarians like carnists contribute to keep the status quo. it's not debatable.

you choose to live how you want - within the limit of the law - and it's totally ok. but own your choices, you don't need to justify them.

we all are full of contradiction, and it's more than ok. but don't make up stuff to make them ok. just accept them.

[–] aroom@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I totally understand your point of view and think that your perception is valid. If you try to analyse why you find them preachy and judgemental it could be interesting.

For example would find them so annoying if you agree with them? Is it the discourse that annoys you or the person? Is it your belief system being challenged that annoys you or the facts that are being stated?

It's always intersting to understand why we feel that way when we are challenged, and veganism is one of a few topic that can create what we called in psychology reactance, an interesting topic.

Veganism is really different than religion tho, cause it is totally backed by science (regarding food production, waste issue, C02 and sentientism) and a logic construct.

[–] aroom@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

they are great conversations about why people are so annoyed by vegans and most of the time it's not because vegans are harassing or pushing their agenda, it's more a question of how we perceive ourself when comparing ourself to others.

it's due to cognitive dissonance.

[–] aroom@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

this argument that non industrial cattle is sustainable is totally moot. please check the literature available.

[–] aroom@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

human are omnivore, it's a biological trait not a diet. Being omnivore doesn't mean that you need to consume animal products, in the contrary, it means that you can avoid them and still strive, as opposed as carnivore.

own your choices, plain and simple. don't blame other for taking action to reduce suffering, CO2 and waste of ressources.

[–] aroom@kbin.social -5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

the fact that you label some vegan as purist says more about your own conflicts that the way vegan choose to live. vegan purist is a nonsense. you are either vegan or not.

you choose what you consume, but don't put the blame on vegan. for me being vegetarian or carnist is not so different. vegetarian are still supporting the status quo and it's fair to state this fact.

once again it's your choice. own it.

[–] aroom@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] aroom@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Apple Music pays two time what Spotify does. Easy pick between the two.

[–] aroom@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›