abbenm

joined 4 years ago
[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

nothing is free

Plenty of things can be and are free at the point of service/point of consumption/utilization.

That's all they need to be. And there just has to be enough willpower to do that from enough people.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 weeks ago

Ok So who is going to give you something for free and why?

People who value the ability to do publish information, or engage in personal expression, for starters.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Thank you for that read. Seems to completely miss the point of federation. The core motivations related to improving choices about how user names and federation structure works, and forcing their domain to be the mandatory user facing side of the whole network could not possibly miss the point more except by being actually centralized. Mandatory firehose relays of the entire networds data that can't be federated or defederated that could be prohibitively costly to host?

And the complexities under the hood that attempt to square this circle are infinitely more confusing than explaining Mastodon instances.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've been on KBin Social, Lemmy World (least 2 dedicated accounts), KBin Run, Mastodon, Blue Sky .etc

Blue sky is not on the fediverse. They've decided to come up with their own federating system from the ground up, which I think kind of squandered what could have been a pivotal opportunity to help facilitate a mass exodus from Twitter, contributing to fragmentation and confusion.

But anyway. I think they intend to have their own version of federating soon but I don't think it's up and running yet.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doesn't Kagi offer X amount of free searches per month before you pay?

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What are some things you use it for if you don't mind my asking?

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Just to mention another file explorer, Solid Explorer is great especially becase it's easy to access Google Drive without having to use the Google drive interface.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Strongly agree. Deus Ex is still even now my favorite game ever. NPCs sound like real people and actually have meaningful things to say.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I keep getting stuck at the beginning in Nier Automata. Is there really no option to save until after like 30+ mins of gameplay?

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know this is not the point, but "begs this question" is the oddest construction of that phrase I've heard yet.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Oh shoot, that's actually the best example of all, and, in fact a great counterpoint to all of those examples above. If Ladybird does it and can sustain it, then Mozilla really has no excuses.

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I entirely agree with you about Google perpetually shifting the goalposts, which increases complexity and works to their advantage. I would say I think of the standards and technology as being, in many ways, integrally related.

I think the idea though, is that it has indeed grown so vast that you need, effectively, teams of teams to keep up. There are browsers done with small teams of developers, but the fruits of those, imo, are not super promising.

Opera: moved to Chromium.

Vivaldi: also on Chromium.

Midori: moved to Chromium.

Falkon: Developed by the KDE team. Perhaps the closest example to what you are thinking of. It's functional but lags well behind modern web standards.

Netsurf: Remarkable and inspiring small browser written from scratch, but well behind anything like a modern browsing experience.

Dillo: Amazing for what it is, breathing life into old laptops from the 90s, part of the incredible software ecosystem that makes Linux so remarkable, so capable of doing more with less. It's a web browser under a megabyte. Amazing for what it is, but can barely do more than browse text and display images with decent formatting.

Otter: An attempt to keep the Old Opera going, but well behind modern standards. Also probably pretty close to what you are suggesting.

Pale Moon: Interesting old fork of pre-quantum Firefox but again well behind modern web standards.

All of the examples have either moved to Chromium to keep up, or are well behind the curve of being modern browsers. If Firefox had the compromised functionality of Otter it might shed what modest market share it still has, not to mention get pilloried in comment sections here at Lemmy by aspiring conspiracy theorists.

I do love all of these projects and everything they stand for (well, the non-chromium ones at least) but the evidence out there suggests it's hard to do.

view more: ‹ prev next ›