Grippler

joined 1 year ago
[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nono, it will always only be used to catch criminals, that won't change...it's what makes someone a criminal that changes.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Literally the article linked in the OP...

Article 10a, which contains the upload moderation plan, states that these technologies would be expected “to detect, prior to transmission, the dissemination of known child sexual abuse material or of new child sexual abuse material.”

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

It will detect known images and potential new images...how do you think it will the potential new and unknown images?

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 23 points 5 months ago

So you're saying there is a chance...

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 8 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The images that are flagged by such scanning, local or server side, will have to be manually verified to avoid false persecution. Someone will have to look at the private images you've sent that might get flagged.

These systems have huge margins of error and are incredibly inaccurate, so there will be a significant task in manually verifying everything. And do you trust some government random employee (or just the departments general IT practices or ability to not be hacked) with not leaking your nudes or personal images? I sure as hell don't.

And even if this is handled perfectly and all government employees are super super honorable standup citizens that never do anything slightly wrong ever...There are still malicious governments that persecute minorities, I doubt they will handle these backdoors in digital privacy very well.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Only under the assumption that 2>=M>1

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Even parties to the left are pro this surveillance bullshit.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

But then again, we also have pretty much every EU group pushing for super invasive chat control. It's ridiculous how schizophrenic they are on the subject of digital privacy.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 48 points 5 months ago (21 children)

I am confused then what is Congress' problem here?

The data is also available to DJI, and through them the CCP.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 0 points 5 months ago

Yeah it doesn't really seem provide any useful functionality.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Using a V6 style hot end with 0.2MM brass CHT nozzle. According to the flow test method CNC kitchen uses I max out around 54mm^3/s @220°C. I can only print that fast on larger prints though because my cooling can't keep up on small prints.

view more: ‹ prev next ›