This could be achieved by coiling up the space where the filament travels through
Yes, that's also what I already mentioned in the other comment...
"Unless you have a coil or something inside the tube heater so it spends longer time in there"
but as I also mentioned, pulling filamennt through a coil will also introduce significantly more resistance than pulling (or pushing if using bowden) it straight, which might be an issue at high speeds and cause under extrusion.
Yes I can read it. You think I'm an f'ing idiot?
I mean, you're certainly not providing much proof that you have any measurable software skills that enables you to do the proper evaluation even if you received the code from proton. Why should anyone believe this unsubstantiated claim from you?
Edit: for the record, I'm don't give a shit and I'm just yanking your chain here.
I doubt this will work with faster printing materials. 40mm/s is suuuuper slow compared to speeds that most modern printers are spitting filament with (not necessarily TPU). Unless you have a coil or something inside the tube heater so it spends longer time in there, but that probably also introduces a lot of resistance so moving the material through is notably harder.
In find the location and grouping of parameters more intuitive in orca. I always had to look through several tabs to find the parameter I wanted to adjust when I was using prusa, it was never where I thought it should be.
I wonder why they didn't apply any of their lesson's learned from the 13 models to the 16...it's not like they're starting from scratch with no knowledge, several of the issues mentioned should not exist on a concept that has had multiple iterations already.
A regulatory change would obviously need to prevent them from hiding that kind in intentionally too long legalese TOS. It has to be a clear single acknowledge, not obfuscated or bundled with functionality.
I wholeheartedly believe that all forma of unsolicited or public advertising should be completely banned. Nothing good comes from it, it is only a nuisance to everyone.
I'm honestly not quite sure, I just know people are getting riled up when it's mentioned.
Can it really be a design "overhaul" when it's still just a square with rounded edges, with roughly the same dimensions?
To be more helpful than the joke comments you've received so far, it's graphene OS that's causing a lot of controversy.
They just need a way to let users grant that store the necessary permissions to install and manage apps, which currently requires root
No it doesn't? I'm using fdroid to install and manage apps just fine on an Android device without root access.
Sure thing buddy, you're a very talented young man indeed π