Ah, my mistake. Thanks for the correction.
Wow, that's a pretty discussing comment. You do not agree with a few peoples views, do generalise and want them to die. You're worse than tankies.
Edit: my memory failed me. Wrong guy.
Isn't he the pro-Russia dude that got overthrown? If so, this kind if reeks of self-promotion.
Bashing govt, so what, he can win and hand Ukraine back to Russia?
Lol, I hit the nail on the head it seems.
Very different context there. I'd much prefer a Bernie (minus the Israel stance) or an AOC, but some points in history call for pragmatism. I'm a Brit anyway, so not really my circus.
I'd like to hear what you think is right in the current situation. Throwing quotes and platitudes without serious discussion of the options is a shallow discussion.
You prefer Trump or Kamala? Do you genuinely see another option? I hardly see the overthrowing of the capitalist class is happening in the next 4 months. What do you think is best for the Palestinian cause, Kamala or Trump?
Plus, Kamala in the vid is talking to AIPAC, in a very different context. What do you genuinely expect a politician to say?
Ah, a classic Luddite ad hominem. Show's how weak your argument is.
So for you, this isn't about climate, but animals? Are you an environmentalist or a vegan using climate to push vegan goals?
No matter how bad she is, she's against a guy who tried to recognise Jerusalem as the sole capital of Israel.
These Dem's are poor, these Republicans are horrific. Discrediting Kamala only serves to reduce Dem turnout and increase likelihood of a Trump win. Do you really want that?
Trash her after the election, we do not have time for this now.
Oh, and sharing x content, and driving traffic there, to a website who's owner is supporting the capitalist class is hardly beneficial to anyone.
No, in that case, you're digging up carbon in trees, lighting it and putting it in the sky...
But that carbon wouldn't be in the air otherwise, so not good. Reduce, reuse, recycle.
Creepy how folk shill for more control by man over nature and our ecosystems. That has been so great for the planet.
To generate organic material will still take significant energy and materials, probably not much less than standard practice unless you're looking at corporate funded research.
This feels like hijacking climate with a trojan horse for GM tech. "Now you like and eat your lab grown meat, how about, better yield, less disease. Let's just flick these switches and change it. Oh BTW, this tech is proven and great to generate organs and flawless offspring". Corpate entities gonna do everything to extract profit and do not care about the implications.
No, no and no.
Nah, it's quite big and well known in open source circles.
You do you, though.
Ah, my mistake. Thanks for the correction.