this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
81 points (98.8% liked)

Games

16536 readers
1061 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Is cut ties the new corpo lingo for saying fired??

[–] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good catch. Corporate speak revolves around saying shitty things but spinning them in a positive way.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 points 4 months ago

See also, right sizing, or realigning with market trends.

[–] Hemi03@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

never sell your studio or game to a publisher. I hope every one understands that this time around.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 months ago

It's not that simple for everyone. Some of the studios that wound down in the last year did so because they couldn't find funding from publishers, due to the general lack of investment. It's not easy to run a games company with no outside investment whatsoever.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That's easy for us to sit back and say on some internet forum. When a large company exec is sitting in front of you, waving a massive pile of money at you, it's a hell of a lot harder. Especially if your company is struggling or you just really want to focus on making games and leave the business side of things to someone else.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago

Yes but, money now!

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago

Embracer extends then extinguishes.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

"Cut ties with," as if the studios were made independent. You shitcanned them. You fired four and a half thousand people, because of unrelated gambling problems.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Jesus, didn't know they controlled the devs behind DRG. Their newest spinoffs looked very....generic. This probably explains why. :/

Really dislike games companies being listed on the stock market. Seems to corrode them from the inside out.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Really dislike ~~games~~ companies being listed on the stock market. Seems to corrode them from the inside out.

FTFY.

[–] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don't think Embracer had any say on drg's game development. If they did, well they were obviously more focused on buying too many game companies to care much about development.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fuck embracer. I'm never getting another good timesplitters

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

Granted, the leaked footage made it look more like a third person shooter, like fortnight