55

The new norms reframe the Catholic Church’s evaluation process by essentially taking off the table whether church authorities will declare a particular vision, stigmata or other seemingly divinely inspired event supernatural.

Instead, the new criteria envisages six main outcomes, with the most favorable being that the church issues a noncommittal doctrinal green light, a so-called “nihil obstat.” Such a declaration means there is nothing about the event that is contrary to the faith, and therefore Catholics can express devotion to it.

...

The norms also allow that an event might at some point be declared “supernatural,” and that the pope can intervene in the process. But “as a rule,” the church is no longer in the business of authenticating inexplicable events or making definitive decisions about their supernatural origin.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Never thought I'd see the day when the Vatican would take a "We can't prove anything is supernatural" position. This is a big day for skepticism.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

If I'm reading it correctly, they realized that with smartphones and the internet any/everyone can plainly see these miracles are fake, so they're proactively sidestepping the entire thing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

It is in the sense that they're not actively promoting the supernatural, but this wishy-washy approach where they say you can still believe in it if you want to and there's nothing wrong with venerating supernatural things we can't confirm to be real is not as helpful as it could be.

[-] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

For a 2000 year old institution this is a big move. I'll take any win I can get out of them.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

You're right. I shouldn't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm also glad to let the Roman Catholic Church render itself obsolete and irrelevant. The participation of the USCCB in the Christian nationalist movement, and the Catholic Federalist Society wing of SCOTUS is going to cause a heavy backlash against the entire church, including the Holy See if it continues to push dogma-driven doctrine and further strip civil rights.

It's really time for religious institutions to resign from their position as the second estate.

[-] ScruffyDucky@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not so sure

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

Aren't miracles "supernatural"? Don't people need 2 "confirmed" miracles to be considered for sainthood?

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. And hagiography deals in manufacturing a myth by asserting it cannot be disproven with available data.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

So are they going as far as to say the Resurrection of Jesus was likely to be ahistorical?

We're used to a post-Newtonian world being free of ghosts, fairies and divine intervention. But recognizing that their own origins are mythical would be a significant step.

It's as much admitted to seminaries, just not to the laity.

this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
55 points (98.2% liked)

Skeptic

1154 readers
2 users here now

A community for taking a critical look at pseudoscience, quackery, and bald-faced BS.

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." ~ David Hume

Things we like:

• Thoughtful discussion
• Humor
• Civility

Things we don't like quite so much:

• Trolling
• Low-effort comments and posts
• Personal attacks
• Spam
• URL shorteners

Carl Sagan's Nine Precepts of Skeptical Thinking:

  1. Confirm the reality (independent of the status quo).
  2. Encourage debate on the evidence by proponents of all points of view.
  3. Avoid appeals to authority.
  4. Recognize that there is always more than one hypothesis.
  5. Do not cling to a hypothesis simply because it is yours.
  6. Attaching a numerical quantity is key to discriminating hypotheses.
  7. In a chain of argument, all the links must work—not just most of them.
  8. Everything else being equal, the simplest explanation is the most likely.
  9. Proposals that cannot be proven or shown to be false do not have much scientific value.

Suggested Fediverse Communities

RFK Jr. Watch @lemm.ee - Tackling misinformation being spread by antivaxxer politician, Robert F Kennedy Jr.
DebunkThis @lemmy.world - an evidence-based community for debunking misinformation and dubious claims.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS