npr and associated press are free and not for profit.
I said infrastructure, not just storage. and yes there is even more involved like the user base, as we have seen with social media time and time again. Even if Microsoft built an even better YouTube (lol), it's still very likely no one would use it. It's a massive investment with a lot of risk.
that's a lot different than just running a video clip.
the infrastructure cost required to host the quantity of video YouTube has is insane.
The redundancy is already there since we have 32 teeth to begin with. If you lose one or two it's not really a big deal.
And there's a fine line between helpful regrowth and cancer. the more regrowth there is, the more likelihood there is of cancer.
hm forced labor sounds quite socialist to me. mr conservative, why don’t you let these kids explore the open market for their labor?
no problem, boiling starts at 100C.
They are getting hit with the consequences of a century of industrialization while we have reaped the benefits in the US and Europe. We owe it to them to at least let them take refuge.
This is when the whole “if all you find are assholes, you must be one yourself” rhetoric does not apply when it comes to multiplayer games.
it's the internet in general.
on average night on the moon is 15 earth days. it’s not trivial to store 15 days worth of solar energy. nothing to do with elitism whatsoever.
i mean you can subscribe to watch it and cancel.
obviously nothing is literally “free”, that’s a trivial point to make. operational funds have to come for somewhere. The point was there's no additional cost to the reader (that they aren't already paying for) to get news from those sources and they don't depend on ad revenue or data monetization to make a profit.