this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
624 points (96.2% liked)

News

23274 readers
3543 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 121 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This is the fourth or fifth one I’ve read about today. The kids are effecting change. I love it.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Thank you for spelling effecting correctly.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Isn't effect a noun, affect a verb? Am I supposed to discern which in other ways?

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

To "affect" a change would be to alter the change itself, for example if the university had already been reviewing its portfolio then the protesters might be affecting the change by making it happen more quickly.

To "effect" a change would be to cause the change in the first place.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is one of the few oddities of the English language that I struggle with constantly. It seems like, as a native speaker, most of the other ones just "feel" or "sound" right, but I haven't been able to nail that down with effect/affect for some reason

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The trouble is that both words have a verb sense and a noun sense.

The noun sense of affect is something like "mood" or "emotion" and isn't used often, while the noun sense of effect is "thing that happened (because of some cause)" and is a rather common word.

The verb sense of affect is "to cause something to happen (to something)" and is a pretty common word, while the verb sense of effect is more like "to make something be true" as in "effecting change" above.

The mnemonic I use is from dungeons and dragons, some spells are "mind-affecting effects" meaning they change minds and they're caused by the spell being cast.

[–] Laurentide@pawb.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If I use my Persuasion skill to help someone think their way through a problem, is that a "mind-effecting affect"?

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

I don't know that I'd say persuasion skills are an affect, but if your mood gives people ideas, that'd work.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Effect" can also be used as a verb, as used above.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Both can be both nouns and verbs. This to me is the most annoying English oddity of all.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I hope to effect a change in your perspective.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

You know, I'm also super pedantic about this and only learned I'd been doing it wrong very recently.

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (3 children)

These are full-grown adults in university. They are not kids.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

It's all relative

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 6 months ago

I greeted my fellow 20-ish-year-olds with "what's up kids" at that age as a way of saying we were still young party machines. I am not disrespecting these folks.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago (16 children)

I don't think I'd consider most 18 year old "full grown adults"

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In this case, no change happened because the university didn't invest in Israel in the first place.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 months ago

The students being allowed to peacefully protest at all is a nice change, and hearing about it could encourage other peaceful protesters, who could enact more direct change

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Sacramento State’s updated policy states that it “does not have any direct investments in these areas” right now but, in accordance with students’ demands, its investment portfolios will “remain free of such direct investments.”

Students: We're protesting until our school stops investing in stuff that's bad!

University: Uh, we already don't.

Students: We did it! We freed Palestine!

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 55 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I don't think the students though that divesting would save all the Palestinians. I mean, I am sure one person did, but that is what happens when you have a large group of people. I think they just wanted to apply pressure against Israel where they could.

I think it is based and probably the most effective thing they could do to stop the genocide.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (4 children)

You attempt a lazy joke here because it seems you need attention, but policy like this matters, especially when things get "quiet" again after the spotlight fades. Also, in addition to divestment, the university also met their demand to appoint “a faculty member from Faculty for Justice in Palestine to sit on the finance committee, ensuring that investments remain ethical every year.”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cas9111@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They did win. They know now that University is morally right and doesn't support a genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Wow, I guess listening to the protesters instead of calling cops on them is crazy 🙄

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 58 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that’s… that’s the joke

[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You know what, honestly, I can't blame the above commenter. Have you seen some of the trash headlines are made of these days?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Maybe if it were the National Review, Daily Caller, NYPost, or something like that.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

It’s Jezebel, which tells us nothing except that I’m surprised they’re still in business.

[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

Definitely in that case, but short of something wackily eye-catching like "infoturkbot" or w/e tf that garbage is, I usually dont notice the name until im already on the page. I'm just sayin, I could easily imagine a few circumstances that would lead to someone not getting the obvious sarcasm in the headline.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

I think Jezebel should be included in the "something like that"

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›