this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
403 points (99.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
4433 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 86 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Hopefully setting a precedent for other states in similar situations. The states need to stop relying on the fed to protect them from radicals and get it done themselves. Their reliance on the fed has allowed extremists to thrive in their state and bleed into local politics.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Just wait for the extremists to get in fed again. Those states rights are gonna get a whole lot weaker if the states do things the extremists don't like.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

people on the right love the constitution though. it'll be tough to get too much past the 10th amendment. no bipartisan support.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Funny, as soon as the constitution says something they don't like (such as insurrectionists can't be president), then suddenly it doesn't matter because that's old.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Lots of cherry picking for sure

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

They quashed a near total ban because a handful of Republicans either didn't like how extreme it was or didn't like how difficult it made their reelections. They didn't seize control and boot out the radicals. Arizona's radicals enacted a 15 week ban in 2022 that's now back to being the law of the land.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Of course nothing changes overnight but it’s progress

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

This is a win, not a total victory. Enjoy it for what it is, don't pretend it's useless.

[–] Horsey@kbin.social 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The situation here is very, very unique. The state is a swing state that has been trending slowly Democratic. When the AZ Supreme Court ruling came out, Democrats began salivating at the thought of a gigantic turnout for the pro abortion ballot initiative. Any smart GOP politician in the state began to shit their pants because abortion rights ballot initiatives could surge the Democratic turnout in all the state political races and could turn AZ dark blue based on this one single issue. The writing is on the wall though… AZ will be a blue state, but it’s not going to happen quickly as long as the GOP doesn’t piss off the state with unpopular policies.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That’s great news!

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The Fed? As in the one that regulates the interest rates?

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think it was more like a literal handful of arizona gop state legislators realized how bad of a look not repealing this law would be for the state republicans up and down the ballot this year and took away a cudgel the state democratic party was going to hammer every republican on the ballot with.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago

Whatever the reason it's a good outcome this time.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Great W. Great timing. Rack 'em up going into November.

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Bad timing, IF it depresses pro-choice turnout enough to give Republicans full control of the AZ state legislature (and potentially the federal government) so that they can re-implement this ban or something close to it. Republicans only need 4 state senators and 9 state reps for a veto-proof majority, which they had as recently as 2012. The existence of the ban was expected to juice turnout on the left -- hopefully people do not have short memories.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The existence of the ban was expected to juice turnout on the left – hopefully people do not have short memories.

Good points and fair. I think its an unanswered question as to the impact that RvW will have on turnout. Very very real possibility of a repeat of 1980, except Blue not Red. I'm not sure polling will model this effectively (in fact I'm highly confident it isn't / won't model this component accurately).

Anecdotally, I've never seen the conservative women I know so activated to and pretty instantaneously converted to voting D. Prior they always had excuses or reasons for justifying the reason the voted R. 100% conversion rate for the admittedly very small sample size. Its not even really about abortion, its about civil rights, personal liberty. They've basically become single issue voters and Roe V Wade is the issue.

I also don't think the fight in Arizona is over, and nationally this is going to stay in the news. Depends like you said on how short peoples memories are. This is a very losing issue for R's.

[–] outer_spec@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 months ago

yes!!!! 😊

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

Better late than never?