83
Removed (reddthat.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by 01010101011@reddthat.com to c/anticonsumption
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago

First of all, why is the y axis on the right? Second of all, this is made look much bigger than it is as the y axis doesn't start at 0.

[-] 1111@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

This y axis placement is quite common for stock tickers. I suppose it is intended to make it easiest to see the most up to date price, which is the pertinent information for most readers. Similarly, the y axis starting at zero is conventional wisdom for scientific data, but I suppose the most relevant visual for stocks is the price fluctuation, which is best viewed with y autoscaling over the selected timeframe.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

Is this in response to union efforts?

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago

It's because they announced to shareholders they made $500 million less than expected in the last 3 months. They expected to make $9.1 billion but made $8.6 billion. Their sales are down worldwide indicating it's not just a US thing.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Or the opposite. I now actively avoid Starbucks due to their behavior towards unions. When I do go, I always ask the employees if they have unionized yet.

[-] Five 6 points 2 weeks ago

Possibly. Starbucks, Workers United made ‘significant progress’ in last week’s contract talks.

I wouldn't put it past them to under-report their earnings to get more leverage in unionization negotiations, engineering a temporary drop in share price.

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Is that your kink?

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

That's impressive

this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
83 points (92.8% liked)

Anticonsumption

272 readers
1 users here now

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS