this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
42 points (95.7% liked)

Public Health

375 readers
3 users here now

For issues concerning:


๐Ÿฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Iโ€™ve seen this elsewhere. He was juking his stats by blocking people with challenging circumstances. One example was an entry for a 300lbs baby. He could then operate only on people where success was more certain and have awesome stats.

[โ€“] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

That's somehow worse than every possibility I imagined.

[โ€“] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've read TFA, and it doesn't seem to say why or in what way the records were altered?

Was the doctor deliberately trying to get people excluded from the program? or doing something else that was caught by the system so it flagged their records as invalid?

[โ€“] Tramort@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

some_guy is stating that he was excluding high risk recipients in order to juice his own success rates (simpler patients means better outcomes)

[โ€“] DODOKING38@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Is that a bad thing? Like If you had a choice between 2 patients but one had a higher chance, which would you choose?

[โ€“] Tramort@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

Yes; it's bad because it's dishonest.

It's not about which specific rules they follow: it's about the importance of WHATEVER rules are chosen, and the whole community following them.

[โ€“] skozzii@lemmy.ca -1 points 7 months ago

Yeah that how it should work but he was probably putting poors ahead of the rich which is a big no-no its today's capatalist America.

Rich get good treatment, the poors get to fight for scraps.