this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
42 points (95.7% liked)
Public Health
375 readers
3 users here now
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
๐ฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (๐)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've read TFA, and it doesn't seem to say why or in what way the records were altered?
Was the doctor deliberately trying to get people excluded from the program? or doing something else that was caught by the system so it flagged their records as invalid?
some_guy is stating that he was excluding high risk recipients in order to juice his own success rates (simpler patients means better outcomes)
Is that a bad thing? Like If you had a choice between 2 patients but one had a higher chance, which would you choose?
Yes; it's bad because it's dishonest.
It's not about which specific rules they follow: it's about the importance of WHATEVER rules are chosen, and the whole community following them.
Yeah that how it should work but he was probably putting poors ahead of the rich which is a big no-no its today's capatalist America.
Rich get good treatment, the poors get to fight for scraps.