I tried watching the video. I am genuinely interested but I couldn't. The video is ~~uncuted~~ (edit: uncut*, my English is so bad) and very slow paced. After 10 minutes I gave up (50 minutes remaining).

Maybe an other time or with an other video.

[–] vort3@lemmy.ml 39 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I hope someone watches it and post a tl;dr here.

I'm interested too, but I don't understand why everything has to be a video (instead of something like a blog post) and don't have an hour for that.

[–] Daqu@lemm.ee 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

https://www.summarize.tech/youtu.be/6bjMzrK3FUs

Didn't watch, but AI generated a summary:Sound nice, but need an extra power source. Raspi as a DAC. Planar drivers.

Not for me.

[–] vort3@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

Thanks mate, much appreciated.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

God's honest truth. 5 minutes of reading content gets stretched into 30 minutes of &$#@ video.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I think this video is a extreme example of the problem.

Its a one hour video bookended with statements that the author doesn't have time to make a better video.

0:00:15: Now I've written a lengthy script but I have no time to actually read it out correctly from memory so I think I'm just going to use it as notes and talk from the top of my head instead.
...
1:07:15: I'm kind of sad that I can't do this review like better technically cuz i can't afford to spend you know a month editing this video.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

There's an old joke about how long it takes to prepare a talk in academia. Want an hour? I can do it right now. 30 minute presentation? I'll need a few weeks. 10 minute presentation? Better give me one or two month lead time.

[–] Juno@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

Thank goodness

I tried watching and even skipped around. " I keep mine in a bag, let me show you" then he gets up for a min, then he struggles with the bag. I searched for... you know... INFO ABOUT THE FUCKING HEADPHONES for maybe 5 min after watching for 3-5 min.

Soon it was "welp, guess I'm not checking those out"

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago

A friggin hour??? goddamn. I thought "10 mins... at 1.5x, that's going to be fine", but 1h is too much.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] gwildors_gill_slits@lemmy.ca 43 points 7 months ago (3 children)

What a fucking terrible name

[–] abclop99@beehaw.org 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

ploopy!

[–] trslim@pawb.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Curse you for reminding me of my childhood.

[–] abclop99@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

Thanks

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago

That is a name only an open-source project could have.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, Schlitz beer is doing okay

[–] gwildors_gill_slits@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

I guess these names are definitely memorable

[–] dream_weasel@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 7 months ago

That definitely looks like a guy who would have ploopy open source headphones.

[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago

Cool project, pretty pricey... Seems like a very niche market for something like this. Also, I agree with "ploopy" is a terrible name. Lol.

[–] kalistia@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

Ploopy the headphones, recommanded by Ploppy the Jailer

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I have these and really like them. They sound great. But they don't get super loud without peeking.