Kelly

This is just Polygon's guess of what they think will be nominated - pure crystal ball gazing.

That said on previous years there has been a few weeks between ballots being due and the cut off for a games release date:

Ballots were sent out to outlets on Oct. 29, due back on Nov. 6, [...]. Outlets also had until Nov. 13 to send in updated versions of those ballots, if changes were necessary. [...] To be eligible, the game must be released before Nov. 20 [...]

https://www.polygon.com/2020/11/18/21574150/the-game-awards-nominations-2020-games-list

Its improved a lot since the early days but the docs can always be refined further.

If you find something that needs improvement opening an issue over here will get a few eyes on it.

https://github.com/godotengine/godot-docs/labels/topic%3Adotnet

Are they valuing it at €1 per cart?

That seem too high for production costs and too low for retail value.

This is the commit where the license changed:

https://github.com/stenzek/duckstation/commit/9ca6b5430fb358b39f21ce0b2fc0268de954dd23

The parent link on that page takes you to the most recent before the license change:

https://github.com/stenzek/duckstation/commit/25bc8a64803df7e702db66e0f11d7b7d0fdc99f2

Anyone can fork the repo and continue working from 25bc8a6

Open critic has a handy chart available for scored titles that compares it with the rest of their database. This offers some insight into the score distribution:

• a score of 50 places in the 6th percentile
• a score of 60 places in the 15th percentile
• a score of 70 places in the 40th percentile
• a score of 80 places in the 79th percentile
• a score of 90 places in the 99th percentile

So a score of 70 is already pretty mid, and 60 or lower is going to be dire.

The Annapurna Interactive entity still exists and still has contracts with developers and platform owners.

What's happened is that all their staff left. People have been moved over from other Annapurna divisions in an effort to keep things running but its likely a lot of institutional knowledge has been lost.

If I was a developer with a title being managed by them I would be very concerned for its future.

Why do they do this?!?

I guess its either:

• they think it will improve sales because the second hand market for "code in a box" is small
• they think it will cost sales but by less than the money they save by not manufacturing game cards
• they don't know if either is true but they are willing to experiment to find out.

When its some regions only like this is feels like a/b testing. And to be honest its a pretty safe play for them because the die hard physical fans will just order internationally.

If I was buying a PS5 today? I'd buy the more powerful one.

But will I be upgrading from my 2020 PS5? Not unless it breaks.

all the PS4 games the PS5 doesn't have.

Thankfully this list is small enough that you can just ignore it:

• Afro Samurai 2 Revenge of Kuma Volume One
• Just Deal With It!
• Robinson: The Journey
• We Sing
• Hitman Go: Definitive Edition
• Shadwen

https://www.playstation.com/support/games/ps5-backward-compatibility-games/#only

workers who have lost their jobs should "drive an Uber" or "go to the beach for a year" until employment settles.

The second part has real "let them eat cake vibes"!

They've released 22 video games over the last 40 years, they may have slowed a little in recent decades but they never really stop.

If we cross reference the above list with the excluded games list here we get an even shorter list:

https://support.xbox.com/help/games-apps/backward-compatibility/what-games-are-compatible-with-my-xbox

• Fighter Within
• FRU
• Kinect Sports Rivals
• Shape Up
• Xbox Fitness