this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
74 points (94.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4014 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Makes sense. My favorite part in the bible is when Jesus, upon amassing tremendous wealth, chiding the poor, and violating the sanctity of marriage multiple times, is persecuted by the Romans. Second coming anyone?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Blessed are the pussy-grabbers. For when you are a star, they let you do it.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago

Thanks for this line..

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Currently, the law prohibits political campaign activity by charities and churches by defining a 501(c)(3) organization as one "which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office." IRS.gov

Lord of Hosts World Outreach Inc. in Omaha, NE is a 501(c)(3) organization. So what they are doing here is categorically illegal. Why does it never seem shit like this is investigated? Why isn’t the headline even mentioning this is a crime? What the FUCK.

edit: How do I, as an individual, get this into court? I want the right thing to happen here. I don’t believe in “tax the church” because there are plenty of religious adjacent institutions that employ non-religious individuals who provide powerful needed services and jobs to their communities. But this is crippling that good will and leaving this specific church untaxed leaves precedent for a continuation of the long cycle of abuse.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Here you go

I'll admit it took some doing to find.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

thanks lol i actually found this yesterday and im just complaining out of frustration 😭 i appreciate your answer though ill try to submit it and i encourage others to do so as well if they see there is evidence to do so

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's amazing what these people will overlook for their single issue: abortion. Of course, this strain of religious grifters have long been entirely devoid of ethics. As far as 'pro-life' though, they're giving Trump credit for something orchestrated by many other people.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Trump being the pro life candidate is still hilarious because I 1000% guarantee you he's paid for multiple abortions

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 19 points 7 months ago

It has been legally shown he paid for one, which is higher than average.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Trump paid for something, though? Maybe..... at the least he surely demanded that women have abortions and and probably threatened them over it.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

"The hand of God is on him and he cannot be stopped."

So in the 2020 election where Trump lost was the 'hand of god' not on Trump and that's why he lost or was 'hand of god', all-powerful, beaten by the electorate?

Which is it? Was the 'hand of god' on Biden in 2020 instead, or was the all-powerful god powerless to stop Biden getting elected?

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

“God works in mysterious ways”

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

“God works in mysterious ways”

'god's will is that Trump lose re-election bids. As it was before, as it will be again. Who are we to question the will of god?'

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

God works in monstrous ways...

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Was it the hand of God doing all the pussy-grabbing? Maybe we were too hard on Trump about that. Perhaps he was the one banging those porn stars and it wasn't Trump cheating on the mother of his newborn child?

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Hey now, people pay these preachers good money so they don’t have to think, much less think logically.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The hand of god was on him but the hand of satan rigged the election. Duh.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So either the hand of god isn't very powerful, or the hand of satan is much more powerful?

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They paying their taxes?

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He can’t even hold the Bible right side up. SMH.

[–] june@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

My mother has posted multiple times how god can even use a donkey and that the man doesn’t have to be perfect for god to use him. She’s completely hand waved away the fact that trump is a paragon of the anti-Christ because ‘god can use anyone’. She’s also convinced that all the conflict in the US is just signs of the times that the second coming is imminent.

Evangelicals literally don’t care what trump has done or will do. Trump was right that he could shoot someone in the head in the middle of the street and his supporters wouldn’t care.

[–] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I genuinely believe there is a disturbingly substantial portion of the right wing that scientifically recognizes the threat posed by the climate crisis but believes it's just God's instrument for the end times, so not only is it not a problem but it's actually a good thing to perpetuate.

[–] Zitronensaft@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I had a chick tract with that exact message left on my car recently, it was very disturbing. The tract’s solution to global warming was war in Israel so Armageddon happens and we all get raptured away from this trashed planet. I didn’t keep it, but I found a copy on their site. I am sharing an archive link because I don’t want them getting more traffic and thinking they need to print even more of these.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240323153015/https://www.chick.com/products/tract?stk=50

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

I've seen enough of them justifying with some version of god using flawed vessels to send his message. Such anti-thinking bullshit.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Trump is absolutely the antichrist

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Funny you say that, because I can't count how many times I've heard evangelicals talking about the antichrist every time a Democrat gets elected. But Trump is the right hand of the Messiah, of course. Lol. I can't believe this is real life.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

The antichrist will subvert the faithful into following them.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Let them lose their tax-exempt status! That would hit them where it hurts them most.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

This is my cue that I need to stop looking at Lemmy for a while. Guess I'll fire up a game and listen to a podcast. See ya later, folks.