this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
282 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
4357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] franklin@lemmy.world 109 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Private industry handling a public utility is never a good idea, see: Texas power grid

internet should be treated like water and power and handled by the city.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

The biggest problem in Texas is greedy politicians (Republicans) making it worse.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Aren't local ISPs essentially banned in a lot of places due to lobbying from the big players? Less abandoned and more actively stomping on its throat.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 7 months ago

It was like that in all of Washington State from 1999 until it was repealed in 2021.

[–] theluddite@lemmy.ml 30 points 7 months ago

Vermont has several towns with as little as a thousand people that have fiber internet thanks to municipal cooperatives like ECFiber. Much of the state is a connectivity wasteland but it's really cool to see some towns working together to sort it out.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Before I moved back to the city, I used to use T-Mobile Home Internet in a very rural area and it was the absolute best internet you could get out there. It was about 70 MBPS down while the DSL in the area was max 10.The only other choices for the area was dial up, which was obviously even slower or satellite through HughesNet, which was super expensive and extremely data limited.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I currently have T-Mobile. I cracked their unit open and attached an external antenna which is installed on the roof. I'm getting about 250 stable. Fiber just became available in my area, but the price is more than what I'm paying now.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's actually really good, isn't it? It makes me hopeful that maybe one day in the future we won't need to run a wire to our houses for the internet just like how we don't run wires to our houses for phone service anymore because nobody fucking uses landlines.

Edit: btw, check out my community i mod !t_mobile@lemmy.ml

[–] mazelado@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have T-Mobile too. Would you mind explaining the process of adding an external antenna? I’d like to get 250 Mbps stable.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You have to open the unit and disconnect at least two of the internal antenna and plug in antenna adapters. Then you can run the coax from the exterior antenna to the unit and plug them in. Then you use an app to locate your closest tower and point the antenna towards that using the T-Mobile app to see your connection strength.

https://youtu.be/wXSpbP8NuWw?si=oyJdwfuJSwcKvdcj

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wish I could get tmo home internet. My only option is starlink and Verizon LTE, and Verizon has managed to ruin my credit multiple times over their own incompetence.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The area I was in did not officially support it but I knew it would work so when I moved before I just brought it with me and turned it on and it worked fine and after I left I told the new residents to just go in and purchase it and if need be give a different addressAnd it would work. And they did.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My signal is weak due to obstructions.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 1 points 7 months ago

Our signal was pretty weak about minus 108 dBm at all times, but it was still enough to be functional and be better than everybody else's internet in the area.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In the absence of service from companies like AT&T, Comcast, Verizon and Charter, counties and small towns in rural America could build broadband networks for their residents themselves, which can make the difference between prosperity and poverty.

A historic provision in the 2021 infrastructure act upholds this tenet of digital democracy: $65bn under the broadband equity, access and deployment – or Bead – program to connect rural America to the world.

Clyburn, wide awake with an opportunity before him, asked Bailey to donate 100 tickets to a tournament for local kids and a couple hundred laptops he could give to students in rural Clarendon county, near Orangeburg.

Sanford Bishop, who represents rural south Georgia, told him about football players taking the team bus to McDonald’s after practice because they could get wifi in the parking lot, Clyburn said.

Barriers in South Carolina resemble those in at least 16 other states today, which, in the name of a “level playing field” – a term coopted by the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council (Alec) in draft language – keeps government entities from competing with private carriers, even in rural broadband deserts.

South Carolina hired Stritzinger away from running Revolution D, a rural broadband consultancy with a legacy of using real-world data to puncture questionable coverage maps promoted by internet carriers.


The original article contains 2,197 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 90%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I thought this was just a bad attempt at cutting down the content, but the original article is just as abrupt and stilted.

[–] jo3jo3@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I skip these summaries entirely. Are they ever any good? I just slipped over them and assume it's bullshit Ai I don't care to read. I'll just read the article if I really care.

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

I find them useful for skimming articles, but when it’s “saved 90%” like this they tend to be somewhat disjointed.

[–] bighatchester@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago

Where I live in Canada everyone thinks they need gigabit internet. My internet sales person was so sure that I needed at least 1 gig internet because I work from home and have a couple of people using YouTube at the same time . But I haven't had a single issue with my 500 megabit internet . That was the lowest I could go , probably would of been fine with 200 - 300 .