this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
636 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

11047 readers
4238 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz
636
Möles (mander.xyz)
submitted 8 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rongbipper@lemmy.ca 46 points 8 months ago

Have this on my camera roll from 2016 lmao

[–] don@lemm.ee 27 points 8 months ago

Those moles have seen some shit.

[–] scaryjelly@lemm.ee 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Americans will use anything but the metric system.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago

At least they tried using it this time

[–] lgmjon64@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure we used this textbook in my highschool chemistry class. Or at least it also used that illustration.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

i distinctly recognize those weird eyes

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's clearly more than a litter of mole

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 8 months ago

Is it? What if you press them down to fill the gaps?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but how many moles of mole per mole are we talking about?

[–] Natanael 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At least 1

[–] RobMyBot@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

And yet, no more than 1

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wüge

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wüge

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wug

For anyone else confused about this comment. :)

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Wow, you guys are abstract!

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

It was a running gag in a linguistics meme page on The Other Side. I'm impressed you made the effort to research it!

[–] watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Ok but why are they naked?

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 6 points 8 months ago

The real question is, why aren't they wearing proper PPE?

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Maybe they just feel more comfortable that way, don't yuck their yumm my dude!

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Stupid question. Why are you?

[–] watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

I’m uhh

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just two? We build whole societies, you know.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Standardized mole.

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

This is a conjecture, at best.

How do I verify the beaker’s volume is actually a litre?

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Pokemon?