Here's a good discussion on why you should vary your news sources along with some charts to show how sources vary and specific examples given. Maybe you can find what you're looking for in there.
this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2021
16 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43757 readers
1092 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
My main news sources are primarily NY Times, npr and a local city paper.
It's not a particularly varied list but I reached a point during the pandemic where I just couldn't handle the firehose of low effort journalism doom and gloom anymore. Opted to choose a couple of quality, relatively neutral sources and cut out the reddit feed. Npr is left leaning in their content and nytimes feels slightly left leaning on their journalism pieces, but based on the political op-ed writeups on the front page that I rarely read it looks right leaning
Initially I paid for a nytimes subscription until I found that I could get a library card from a sort of nearby large city in my state through a statewide reciprocal library card program, at which point I found that better funded library offers a free subscription to the nytimes to any cardholder, so that's how I get access now. I find their higher quality of journalism to be like a breath of fresh air after getting hot boxed every day from the low effort shit that reddit fed us
BBC for international news, CBC for national news and Nature for science news. That gets me the basic discussion, I have to go to niche communities devoted to a specific issue if I want the real story about things.
Keeping it limited to English language news sites:
-
teleSUR News from Venezuela, gives a very different perspective and reports many news from the global south, which are simply ignored in western media.
-
Ruptly If there are protests anywhere in the world, they will have videos.
-
Global Times From China, which will be the biggest economy in a few years. So even if you dont agree with them, its good to know what they are doing, and why.
So even if you dont agree with them
I mean, they're a state run media, it's a deceptive propaganda machine that honest people should find themselves disagreeing with, they're only useful for knowing what the CCP is doing, and maybe getting a glimpse at why, but usually, the "why" is a lie.
I'd trust them as much as I trust Fox News to give me the truth.
Sounds to me like you made up your opinion without reading a single article of theirs.
I made up my opinion after they pushed a narrative in the face of reality time and time again. Like the endless "articles" claiming their forced labor camps are a lie, and their utilization in pushing false calm to the world about covid in the early days.
They are a state run organization under the control of a totalitarian regime who only pretends to be communist, their "articles" reflect that. As I said, they're only useful in seeing where the wind is blowing.