this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
917 points (98.1% liked)

World News

32363 readers
176 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] False@lemmy.world 58 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] lauha@lemmy.one 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Reignited the West's arms industry as well! We had gotten complacent until Putin started the largest war in Europe since WWII.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Guys will see this and say "hell yea"

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 30 points 8 months ago
[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I don't like the expansion of NATO, but due to Russia's recent imperialism, Sweden's and Finland's reactions are completely reasonable. A much healthier alternative would have been actually advancing towards an integrated European defense system involving EU members, with a door open to certain neighbours such as Norway, but it's pretty hard to do that when the political groups that could actually promote that alternative are schizophrenically tolerating positions such as "I'm a pacifist, so I'm advocating for my own country's disarmament despite my neighbours starting wars very recently" and "if Ukraine didn't want to get invaded, they shouldn't have sought guarantees against Russian aggression from third countries".

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think Europeans in general psychologically still feel themselves weak without NATO, unable to fill the needs of their own defense.

I've been reading about 1st Indochina war yesterday, so - emotionally biased.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

EU's population: 448 million

EU GDP: 19 trillion dollars

Russia's population: 143 million

Russia's GDP: 1,78 trillion dollars

Simplifying a bit here (I'm obviously taking Morocco and Belarus for granted, assuming that Turkey wouldn't attack Greece, and so on), but it's pretty much a "gotta get our shit together" situation, because there's no reason why we should depend on the US for defense, or anything else.

[–] paholg@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I assume you meant trillion and not million for those gdp figures? Even then, they're low.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 months ago

That's about architecture more than resources. "Gotta get our shit together" doesn't negate the fact that shit isn't together yet.

It's good to have resources, but such a situation is still weakness. Only I think NATO in some sense is a contributing factor, and EU frankly too, both not in the least because of all those veto and consensus rules.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SevenOfWine@startrek.website 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

startrek website continuing to be the highest quality instance

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Fuck the tankies in here and praise UN and Sweden.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Huzzah! Welcome to the team, Sweden. We can all be self defense buddies together! =D

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Russia locked out of the Balkan Sea now?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] zik@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Kaliningrad's fairly strategically useless to them now that every surrounding country's NATO though. The Suwałki Gap between Kaliningrad and Belarus used to be pivotal in potentially re-taking control of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. It would have been very difficult for NATO defend them if Russia took the gap. But now those countries are protected by NATO countries all around so Kaliningrad's a lot less useful strategically. Not to mention that there's a strong Kaliningrad independence movement so they're struggling to control it internally as well.

More here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 8 months ago

depositing its instrument of accession

Sounds like a sov.cit.

load more comments
view more: next ›