this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
202 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3735 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The majority of Americans — about 59% — say TikTok a threat to the national security of the United States, according to a recent survey of U.S. adults. The findings from Pew Research Center’s…

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] febra@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

“Majority of Americans think dungeons and dragons is a threat to the national security”

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most of those probably just don’t like that their kids are on it all the time. At least some do understand that the real threat is all the data it is constantly collecting from our cameras and microphones as well as location data. It’s not limited to kids either, plenty of adults in jobs that should be secure are walking around with a Chinese wiretap/homing beacon in their pocket.

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m honestly more worried about local companies getting this information from me at such a constant rate. We have plenty of enemies at home, and the rich around here have done infinitely more damaging things to me and my family than anything the Chinese have done to us yet.

[–] Dark_Arc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get this perspective, but I think it really down plays the lack of control we have over foreign products.

Like, if a US company put a bunch of employees in place and then had them simultaneously break into people's houses, the US could arrest those who orchestrated the problem.

If a Chinese company did the same thing, sure we can arrest the individuals (if they're still in the county), but we're completely powerless as a nation to do anything to those that started the problem or those that escaped the country before we found out what they did.

Like the normal concepts of what's legal are just out the window, everything is legal when you're talking about nations vs other nations.

[–] chaircat@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thing is, neither the US nor Chinese company doing a home break-in is a realistic concern.

Realistic concerns are more along the lines of them sharing data that could rightly or wrongly get you on the radar of US law enforcement, or get you discriminated against in some way.

In terms of realistic concerns, your data being in US rather than foreign hands seems like significantly more of a problem.

[–] Dark_Arc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Data is one of those things that you don't know how it's going to be used against you until it is. If somebody is going to have that data, I'd rather my own government have that data vs a foreign government... Harming one's own citizens isn't a great strategy to get your way, but harming another's citizens is quite effective.

The other thing I'll note is this isn't just about what they collect, it's about what they put out/promote; i.e. their ability to shape (or distort) their image. I think lots more people would be concerned if they saw the Chinese govt creating rally halls around the country with high turnout, even if "they're just putting on plays" in those places.

[–] chaircat@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Data is one of those things that you don’t know how it’s going to be used against you until it is. If somebody is going to have that data, I’d rather my own government have that data vs a foreign government… Harming one’s own citizens isn’t a great strategy to get your way, but harming another’s citizens is quite effective.

I don't know what government actions you've been watching, if all of modern history is a guide, it's a lot easier to make a profit by harming your own citizens rather than harming another country's citizens.

From where I've been sitting, the normal pattern is a country's rich and powerful exploit the commoners of their own country for profit and power. It's much harder to gain from exploiting another country's citizens, i.e. you can't directly tax them, you can't take away their things, you can't sell their rights to your powerful friends, etc.

[–] Dark_Arc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

So borderline free Chinese labor hasn't enriched US corporations? The waters for cheap oil and sugar -- those ended really well for the country on the receiving end right? What about the British spice trade and India?

Sure you can collect power within a nation and become a sort of "god within" that nation, but that's nothing compared to nation vs nation conflict. Some of these people don't even have clean running water.

[–] eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean it is in the same way Facebook is.

[–] Odusei@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but I also want to get rid of Facebook. Like I don't think every nation is entitled to their own toxic hell site.

[–] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A majority of Americans also think they’re of above average intelligence. I found this. Just now.

[–] Tot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Roughly 70% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents say TikTok is either a minor or major threat to national security in the U.S.

Either a minor or major threat. 😂

[–] sincle354@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Polls are bullshit, both to design and to report. It's maddeningly hard to whittle down human opinions to neat little answers. It's a science and an artform, really.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're not entirely wrong, but I have a related degree and actually did polling back in the day, so I'll add some nuance.

Most reputable political polls are surprisingly good. Pollsters get it wrong far far less than people think they do. Which is astonishing, given you're often polling a thousand people, to discover the opinions of millions. The problem is that people fail to read the small print, don't understand basic statistics or probabilities, and media misreport what they actually say.

Best example: 2016 US election. No one who knows a bit about polling was at all surprised by Trump winning. IRC if you aggregated, he had a 1/3 chance of winning. Him winning was invariably within the margin of error of many many polls. But the media misinterpreted them and then blamed bad polling for their own mistakes.

And that's not surprising. Polling how someone will tick a box on an election day in the near future, by asking them to do the equivalent of tick a box in a poll? Likely to be quite good predictor.

More vague stuff like this, it's harder. You're not necessarily measuring what you're measuring, and because the media invariably misrepresents scientific studies and polls, you need to read the small print and what they actually asked.

In any case, here's the pollsters article on it (including sample size, methodology, etc.):

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/10/majority-of-americans-say-tiktok-is-a-threat-to-national-security/

And the questions they asked:

https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/SR_2023.07.10.23_tiktok_topline.pdf

For example, it would have been interesting if they'd asked "Is TikTok a threat to national security in the United States?" rather than "How much of a threat...?"

Changing the answer scale would likely also have resulted in different answers.

Also, do respondents know what national security is? It's a pretty vague term for layman.

Hell, do all respondents know what tiktok is? Because if you asked people if the Umbrella corporation is a threat to national security, it's like that many would answer yes.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It was bound to be one of those, sooner or later.

[–] henfredemars@lemdro.id 14 points 1 year ago

It is absolutely a threat to national security because it's a threat to your security, like most social media apps. It just gets more attention because it's foreign-owned here in the States.

[–] glennglog22@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

It is also a threat to our collective attention spans.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about all social media is a threat? Facebook and Twitter haven’t been doing anyone a favor lately with how they spin misinformation to manipulate people.

All of it should be shut down. Life was a lot better before social media.

[–] FxtrtTngoWhisky@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed.

But here we are.

[–] nxfsi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well it is proprietary software from a subsidiary of a de facto state-owned government currently participating in genocide. I changed torrent clients for even less than that.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 10 points 1 year ago

Majority of Americans need a Xanax. Or maybe less Xanax. It can only be one or the other.

[–] Letranger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threat to something or not, it’s pure cringe and should be banned nevertheless

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see this take a lot across forum based socials like reddit/Lemmy etc, but honestly since I've started using it in 2021 it's by far the most advanced algorithm at feeding me solid reoccurring and new content I actually want to see.

[–] los_chill@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I only want to weigh in with the opposite experience, not trying to convince anyone or make a point. But I've had an account for over a year, a few subscriptions, just wholesome or comedic stuff, and get the most garbage or vile sewage on my feed. I am reluctant to open a link to TikTok, because I know it will show me something horrible first. Anyone else have this experience?

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No! I don't really use it much, or like it at all, but I just followed a load of dnb artists cos I like seeing bits of people's sets, and pretty much all I get is dnb.

[–] IIIIII@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't get this reference I'm afraid 😆

[–] paulcdb@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It used to be ok a few months ago but my god, all I did the other day was scroll past train, stolen video clips and general utter shit! How anyone likes that crap is beyond me but I guess thats what happens when 90% of the population have been turned into morons!

It’s gone from slightly entertaining to TV level shittyness so ended up deleting it so now hove nothing to entertain me when on the throne! 😞

[–] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

it's by far the most advanced algorithm at feeding me solid reoccurring and new content I actually want to see.

Well, yes, that's the problem. It's designed by psychology experts to extract as much dopamine as possible from your glands so that you continue using TikTok instead of doing literally anything else with your time, allowing them to expose you to ads and sell fucktons of your data. Algorithms good enough to be addictive ought to be illegal, they're predatory, take advantage of quirks in our brain's reward system, and steal tons of time from our lives we could be using on more fulfilling things.

Just as big a threat as facebook

[–] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Right, now ask them what they think about rap music...

[–] Breno@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

is there an open source alternative to Tiktok?