That's just an insane number to me.
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
That's a lot of rape... Humans have such a fascination with some types of "moral problems" yet seem to care nothing for others.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how a loosing party force fabricates electors that can be manipulated due to an unstable family and potential low income.
I'd love to see the statistics for prosecutions (never mind convictions) to go along with these 64,000 pregnancies caused by rape..
(this is, of course, rhetorical, most survivors don't bother even reporting rape since they know how those who do get treated, and of the few brave that do, almost none get any justice, pregnancy as proof or otherwise..)
The article doesn't seem to say if there's any data on how many there were before the ban?
Obviously abortion bans (and rape, for that matter) are bad, but a raw number without context seems like bad scientific communication.
I'm not sure that's the point, so much as "there will be 64,000 forced births from rapes".
I don't think they're looking at whether or not abortion bans reduce rape (was that ever considered to be a realistic reason to ban it?) Just that there's a shocking amount of rape-related pregnancies in places where people can't get an abortion.
It doesn't appear to be a comparison, it's showing statistics.
Seems like this will be costly to tax payers, and not just financially.
COMBIEN???