this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
37 points (68.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4032 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a matchup between Biden and Trump, many young voters say they might choose silence.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yuriy@lemmy.world 74 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck this strawman, every single (voting age) gen z person i know has already talked about voting in this election. Even if it’s just voting for “not trump”. When one candidate is actively claiming they will operate as a dictator “day one”, you have a lot of incentive to vote. Especially when you haven’t already been living with crushed dreams for decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MamboGator@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Refusing to vote for an imperfect candidate in order to stop a fascist takeover doesn't sound very smart. "We can't have our specialest most perfectest prezzy so lol get fukked every1."

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Neither does ignoring their concerns and saying they should just vote for Biden because he's not trump.

It's true, and they should.

But we have literal decades of evidence showing that "what are you going to do, vote Republican ?" Is a bad strategy and if we want engagement we need to actually do things or at least try

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Think of it this way

By the next election one choice isn't eligible anymore, and the second will likely be so buried under court cases he won't be able to.

So it's more of a "finish what was started" and hopefully by the next election we'll finally have some new people to worry about.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

4 years is a long time...

And we literally just used that excuse 4 years ago and are going to have the exact two candidates...

And history shows we'll likely still have to pick between two elderly out of touch white men in another four years.

One will probably be actually evil again, and the other will likely think changing anything is too rash of a decision and things are changing to fast already.

The entire point of running for office is getting people to vote for you, that's why the party places so much importance on large corporate donations.

But when a moderate candidate can't get voters energized because they're too pro business and won't help Americans, suddenly it's the Americans fault.

Maybe we should re-evalute if "bringing millions from corporations and billionaires" is really more important in a candidate than "people like this person and want to vote for them".

We keep running historically unpopular candidates in the general and then getting mad they're not popular with voters.

Why keep doing it over and over again?

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Why keep doing it over and over again?

Because these corrupt politicians deliver big time for their donors. For recent examples, just look at the massive $2 trillion in tax cuts for the rich and corporations Trump passed. That was pretty much his only legislative accomplishment. And then Biden made those cuts permanent. (Ok, not exactly, he raised them back up a small amount by closing a couple loopholes but not close to what they were pre-trump).

If the established power structure won’t allow outsiders to run, and the donors always get what they want, I ask this question instead:

Why would things ever change from here?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The issue is that Gen Z has clocked onto "to what end?" The GOP is going to run a fascist in every presidential election for at least the next decade, maybe until the party collapses. This is the second election in a row where Gen Z has had to "suck it up because democracy is at stake." They're not idiots, they have a strong suspicion that they'll be told to suck it up again in the election after. Is it any surprise that they're not interested in a system that has told them to shut up and do as they're told?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

The problem is, I'm almost 40 and have been hearing this my whole life. And the Democrats keep moving further right.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As a Canadian philosopher once noted:

If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!

[–] Big_Boss_77@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Let me know once it's time to start keeping things equal with hatchet, axe, and saw.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

“The logic of not voting for Joe Biden in 2024 is that the Democratic Party is supposed to be accountable to young people and diverse communities.”

Such an adorable take. I used to think they were accountable, too. That they gave a shit what I thought and would do things that I approved of, or have a good reason not to. That voting actually sent a message.

Give this kid another decade and he'll be as hopeless as I am.

Then there's this guy:

“[I’ll say], ‘Hey, you want to buy a house after college, right? You want to have a good-paying job after you graduate, right? You want to be able to have access to health care?”

I really don't think voting is the best way to get these things. Especially when Democrats never talk about access to health care, just health "coverage."

What voting for Biden will get you is more boring government. That's about the only thing voting will get you that you actually want.

This kid actually gets it:

And then there’s the Electoral College. For Lillian, it’s difficult to feel like her vote matters in a state that has gone blue since 1980 and a rural county that generally swings red. "The whole [voting] thing is a symbolic gesture,” she says. “If we had a more direct voting system, I would participate more. The Electoral College is scum.”

Want people to think voting matters? Make their vote actually matter. Outside of swing states votes for president just become meaningless statistics, especially since you don't need the popular vote to win the election.

Will the silence be loud enough to create actual change in how the Democratic Party approaches the youth vote in future elections[?]

It never has been, and it never will be.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Dems not talking about healthcare is kinda not true is it? The US has the ACA and coverage means expanding who has access to the ACA and at what tarrifs.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The ACA was supposed to have a public option. But the health insurance companies got Lieberman to kill that. Now whenever I hear a Democratic politician talk about health care it’s about making sure everyone has “coverage.”

Pay very close attention when you hear them talking and you’ll hear it. But people don’t need health insurance, they need health care. And the coverage Dems keep pitching often gets between people and care.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

But the health insurance companies got Lieberman to kill that.

It was designed to be jettisoned from the beginning. Lieberman was just the rotating villain at the time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 19 points 10 months ago

Oh look, more "everybody's doin' it" propaganda

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And thus democracy will die

I don’t believe the kids will abandon their own future but human are dumb as. Fuck when it comes to emotional decision making so who can say

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

It isn't just Gen Z. My own parents are tired of the bullshit, lesser of two complete won't do fuck all for Americans and are talking about opting out of 2024 because they don't want an old guy doing not a lot of them in middle America but don't want to vote for a criminal racist either.

That was a fun conversation about how you don't have to like the old guy, I don't really either, but fuck me if you'll roll over and let a literal fucking Nazi in the office by not voting for ineffective.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The inability to move the needle on student loan forgiveness and school shootings is going to hurt him to some degree.

But at the same time, it's not like Trump is going to even ATTEMPT to do anything about student loans or school shootings.

We need to be clear with non-voters, the issues that are driving you to sit out are not the issues you should be worried about.

Joe Biden is selling weapons to Israel! Yes, weapons they don't actually need to commit the war crimes they are committing.

Meanwhile Trump:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/16/politics/trump-american-jews-israel/index.html

"No President has done more for Israel than I have."

Here's what you should be worried about:

Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are both well past retirement age. Trump could very well ask them to step down so he can appoint someone younger.

He already did that with Justice Kennedy.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/06/donald-trump-justice-anthony-kennedy-retirement

That would give Trump 5 picks on the Supreme Court and lock in a dystopian nightmare of rulings for the rest of our lives.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

How has he been unable to move the needle on student loan forgiveness when substantial amount of loans have already been forgiven and more are in the works? Not being able to forgive 100% of them counts as being 100% unable to do any of it?

This is only the most recent one

https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/biden-harris-administration-announces-nearly-5-billion-additional-student-debt-relief

the only way that effort will continue is if Biden or another Dem is in office because there’s no way the GOP will help.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

You’re absolutely right, a LOT of Biden’s wins people act like it didn’t happen, and if it did and wasn’t exactly what they hoped for it’s trash, etc.

Conservatives can do no wrong to their base, but dems must be perfection or they’re just as bad to a lot of d voters

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago

Pretty much. They’ve been litigating the issue and doing what they can within the constraints they have, but apparently it amounts to nothing to entitled people.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

If you don't vote, you may lose the opportunity next time. Fascists don't exactly like democratic voting systems.

Politics is messy. This just sounds like a bunch of over-privileged naive people who are afraid to get their hands a little dirty.

Your vote isn't a valentine, it's a chess move.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I blame the whole “voting changes things” culture. We tell kids that voting and politics means something and then when they learn how it actually works they get disheartened.

If we lower their expectations I bet they would vote more. Drop the idea that government will be responsive and filled with intelligent statesmen. Forget about any sort of relief or change. Vote for the one who will make politics boring. Vote because these idiots don't know anything and couldn't govern their way out of a paper bag.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

There's a Gen Z kid that I was talking to who said she liked Trump because he's so funny and crazy, and that was literally as much as she knew about him, just the stupid antics. I was horrified, like, "You've got to be kidding?" I hope I did a good job explaining how bad he was for the country, but sometimes I wonder about the kids today. Get off my lawn.

[–] Seraph@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

I'd vote for President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Camacho. He seems like a fun guy!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As a leftist, it's important to accept that the Dems will never, ever, ever move to the left unless there's massive grassroots organization such as Unionization and Socialists winning local elections.

People who abstain from voting as protest, however, still think ironically that voting is anything other than loss prevention. If everyone sits out and protests, literally everyone on the Dem side and Trump wins in a landslide, and Trump manages to keep elections for 2028, the Dems still won't move to the left.

That's why voting as a leftist is about loss prevention, rather than gaining material change. The movement leftward comes from upsetting the entire 2 party process by flipping the table itself. Mass Unionization and taking of key seats is exactly how you (non-violently) upset the process and force concessions or enable third party to be theoretically viable.

Until then, however, any leftist not voting Dem in the federal election is sorely misguided.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Every time I see articles like this it just reminds me of 30 rock.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0OwIMsQ4_4&t=0

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 10 months ago

I wonder what billionaire feudalism propaganda servitor ordered this article written? Someone from the WalMart clan? Koch Bros? Who?

[–] StinkyOnions@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

And them not seeing that having the right to even abstain is at threat.There may not be another election next time.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I guess it's just easier to blame the boomers for the state the country is in, comparing to bothersome things like exercising your right to choose. Kids. Go figure.

load more comments
view more: next ›