this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
75 points (98.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5247 readers
406 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It’s one way to cut consumption.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was thinking that probably would be healthier for me in the long run, ignoring all the other climate effects that will try to kill me.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry. Most food will experience high inflation for the rest of our lives as agricultural output is dependent on a stable climate.

I won't be surprised if meat was too expensive for the vast majority before 2050.

[–] meyotch 3 points 10 months ago

We will just redefine ‘meat’ to include the six legged!

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 0 points 10 months ago

You forgot a word: my.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Sugar is one product that should go up in price. But don't worry, I'm sure lobbyists are pushing the government to subsidize HFCS even more.

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People who don’t eat vegetables are fucking weird to me.

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago

?? Plenty of people eat both sugar and vegetables lol.

[–] Grogon@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't think that will prevent obese people from being obese since they are mostly the rich people. The only thing that could help against obesity is better healthcare education and not increasing the price of sugar and food that has high amounts of sugar in it.

Atleast that is my opinion but it might be worth a try.

Edit: My bad I didn't read the article. It says climate crisis is increasing price for sugar around the world. Not something I personally care about because I don't eat a lot of sugar but this still might help against obesity. Allthough I don't think rich (fat) people will care enough and just buy the food anyways since price isn't the problem.

It's already problematic getting a black coffee from McDonalds before nightshift. Way to many people put a lot of effort into getting "ready" and are content with dining at McDonalds. It's not like they have an emergancy. They really get ready and eat there and act like it is a real dinner where I see it as a necessity or emergancy before I starve or am tired (coffee). It took me 20 minutes just to get a coffee cause they ordered food. I always wonder where these people get the energy from leaving home, driving to a McDonalds and eating there. So much better options to cook at home.

If its only sugar than thats good news.