Waring further added, "And, like, as a species, humans are just stupid. Like, really fucking stupid."
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
36 points (84.6% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5178 readers
745 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
We really are limited as a species. The science has existed for decades, yet an overwhelming population either denies or chooses to ignore it. Plus Maslow's hierarchy of needs - most of us are still focused on the basics of immediate survival. Our biggest problems are selfishness and short-sightedness IMO. Not sure how we could achieve global cooperation to solve climate change, if the threat of extinction isn't doing it. Maybe if we were a hive-mind species lol. I like to imagine what advanced alien civilizations would think of us.
I mean, compared to what? If we don't know of any smarter species out there to set some higher average baseline, how could we be below it?
Compared to smart humans. We have scientists and artists but for every one of them we also have three aggressive, primitive, hairless monkeys.
Only 3? I would have put it well into the double digits.
on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much—the wheel, New York, wars and so on—whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man—for precisely the same reasons.
- Douglas Adams - The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy
They essentially say that (better) international cooperation is required, and must be functional at the required (global) scale... and the other paragraph essentially cautions that "some might find it easier to take from neighbours", leading to war, which is a proven and terrible waste of nearly all resources.
I would note that while we don't have a global society, we do have a global information space (enabling different actors to understand the same data and to see a mutual failure as the end of certain actions, even if their viewpoint differs) - and we do have global trade. Arrangements where an economy making a transiton off fossil fuels, for example, enacts carbon use limits locally and simultaneously taxes carbon-intensive imports across its borders, would remove the biggest dis-incentive to transitioning - that of getting things cheaper by polluting somewhere else.