this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
342 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3285 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold (D) slammed Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) over her decision to switch districts for the 2024 election cycle, calling the move “blatant self-preservation.”

Boebert announced Wednesday that she will not seek reelection in the 3rd District and instead move to the 4th District, currently held by retiring Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.).

“She knows that she has failed the citizens of her district. She has failed to deliver for Coloradans on the western slope on issues that matter to them,” Griswold said in an MSNBC interview. “She has failed to deliver legislatively. There’s scandal after scandal after scandal.”

“I do think this is her trying to hold on to power,” she added.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 55 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Has someone checked to see if the traveling Broadway show of Beetlejuice is now playing in the Colorado 4th district?

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let's all join Lauren boebert in giving her constituents a hand!

[–] DrPop@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago

Not a dry "eye" in the house.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 41 points 10 months ago (2 children)

However, there is already a crowded field of Republicans running to replace Buck,

The most important sentence of the article. She can switch districts if she wants. Can she win a primary?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

I think she does more good for Democrats being in office as she exemplifies the absurdity of the GOP, however any other primary challenger just needs to make ads saying, "she abandoned her last district; she'll abandon you too."

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Probably not. There are plenty of people running that are as far right as her that don't come with the baggage of being a national embarrassment.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Although to the MAGA wing, things that the rest of us consider embarrassments are seen as positives, so who knows anymore?

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

This is sadly very true, but what I'm hearing from the local MAGAts is that they don't like the kind of whore who would do sex stuff on public (with a Democrat, no less). Mostly they're hypocrites, because if she was a man, they'd say that's just how men are. I find a mashing a dude's dick around to be one of the least offensive things she's done except for the whole "in public around people who didn't consent to see that" part, but I'm also not a conservative so 🤷‍♀️

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

~~slammed~~ did a flying suplex on Boebert into the announcer’s table

[–] teft@startrek.website 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

~~slammed~~ ~~did a flying suplex on Boebert into the announcer’s table~~

threw ~~Mankind~~ Boebert off "Hell in a Cell" and plummeted sixteen feet through an announcer's table.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 15 points 10 months ago

and welcome to the jam

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 25 points 10 months ago

Great, that other district will never be able to find that video of her exposing herself and jerking off that dude in front of children.

Strict district boundaries, that youtubes

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

“I do think this is her trying to hold on to power,” she added.

In other words: Jena just confirmed that Boebert is a politician.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold (D) slammed Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) over her decision to switch districts for the 2024 election cycle, calling the move “blatant self-preservation.”

She has failed to deliver for Coloradans on the western slope on issues that matter to them,” Griswold said in an MSNBC interview.

Moving to the 4th District avoids a difficult general election rematch with likely Democratic candidate Adam Frisch, who has significantly out-fundraised Boebert so far in the campaign.

But Griswold said even a more conservative seat doesn’t necessarily mean she’ll be back in Congress.

The chair of the Colorado GOP also criticized Boebert’s switch Thursday, saying the party “didn’t think it was the best move.”

“Time will tell whether or not we’re right, but I think she’s got a serious challenge on our hands trying to explain to the voters of [Colorado’s 4th District] why she thought it was necessary to leave [Colorado’s 3rd District] and have a better chance at keeping her seat in Congress,” party chair Dave Williamson said.


The original article contains 329 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Slammed her huh?