this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
642 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32285 readers
871 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 96 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I bet morale is so fucking high if you're employed by Twitter right now.

Not only has their "boss" shown to fire people indiscriminately, he is also willing to fuck over whatever contact they've sign.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I feel like at this point only the Elon worshipping tech bros still work there

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 61 points 10 months ago

Honestly it's probably mostly immigrants on a work visa and people who haven't found another job and can't afford to quit without something lined up. Sure, some of them are still there because they're Elon stans, but I don't think even they would last long without extenuating circumstances.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or people that can't escape for whatever reason.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 88 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love a good loss for Musky.

[–] Feirdro@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

It looks good on him.

And not much does.

[–] SGG@lemmy.world 61 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Who wants to bet one of the arguments he wanted to use was "Twitter doesn't exist anymore, I run a platform called X, therefore well don't need to honour any Twitter contracts "

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago

So far Elron's excuse is basically "well, I had my fingers crossed"

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Would something like that not be possible as a private company, essentially dissolve and make another? (Not just rename it)

Of course for that to work at all, all the employees would have had to sign new contracts.

And all of this please probably would have had to happen at purchase time (edit)

Probably still not possible even then if everything was done perfectly.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 47 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Some people say stuff like "well bet he didn't get rich by paying his bills! Yeah!" He didn't get rich by not paying his bills either. I knew a lady who inherited a large urban motel and was quite wealthy, and she'd buy 65 cent dozens of expired eggs on sale and be all excited that it was a bargain. It's part of their pathological attachment to having more money, and in Elron/Trump's case, complete disregard for other people and moral principles.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He never got rich in the first place. He was born rich.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure, though not as wealthy as he is currently.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

But that's kinda the problem, right? Piketty's central thesis is that above a certain amount of critical mass capital has a sort of gravity that almost inevitably attracts more wealth to itself at an exponential rate, and only truly cataclysmic events (either on a personal or societal level) can disrupt that accrual. People like Elon, Trump, and all the other failsons and nepo babies populating the millionaire and billionaire class are walking proof of the theory -- even if he wasn't keeping pace with the larger market, Trump still managed to make Daddy's money last until now, and he's self-evidently less intelligent than most small rodents. That wasn't any special talent on his part growing the family fortune -- it's just (effectively) ambient cash getting caught in the gravity well of his inheritance and falling past the event horizon, in spite of his dumbassery.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

If he did get rich by not paying his bills, then that would be even more fucked.

[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is why you need unions.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I like unions and I don't think this is an example otherwise. But, why does this highlight unions? This is a dude that didn't write a check. I don't think he would have paid bonuses to a union either. It seems to me, a judge would be needed in either case.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Union contracts leave things less open to interpretation, union advice helps employees understand that this is a legal issue, and coordinated legal action and representation help you win the fight in court.

Leaving it to individual employees to individually see the problem, recognise they have legal standing, then fight Phoney Stark's infestation of lawyers isn't super-realistic, and turns the employment contracts into nothing more than a weapon to fuck with the employees, because Musk can just ignore anything in the contract favourable to employees.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This was an oral agreement that a judge found binding. This shit happens to unions. Again, I like unions and think these employees would be well-served by one, but it's hard to see this example as "this is why we need unions".

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unions aren't silver bullets - but they're bullets nonetheless, and that's good enough most of the time.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

With that, I agree. It doesn't answer my question, but I'll gladly agree with you.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The court, famous for siding with the workers over the bosses in all but the most egregious cases.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Christmas is running early this year.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Still looking forward to Lonnie's eventual collapse. He's imploding in slow motion.

[–] wintrparkgrl@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I just hope SpaceX doesn't go down with him

[–] janabuggs@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Why? Everything SpaceX has done Nasa has already done. If anything SpaceX is taking resources from public programs.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 months ago