this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
109 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5242 readers
612 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the energy we need to turn this around.

[–] LavaPlanet@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That said this guy is also a piece of shit in a million ways.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

I'm not looking for saints. I'm looking for spears pointed in the right direction.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A mining magnate and climate campaigner at the same time?

[–] silence7 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A mining magnate and climate campaigner at the same time?

It's possible; while shifting off fossil fuels cuts the overall need for mining sharply, it does still involve the use of rare earths, lithium, copper, and other metals

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Plus, people still need everything from kitchenware to trains in a net zero society, which means more metal. While it can be recycled, we need a lot more to get to a point where everyone has the same standerd of living, even before mentioning stone, gravel, clay, etc. Outside of coal and oil producing ingredients like cobalt, i’d imagine that overall mining demand would be rather steady even if a lot of carbon neutral technologies didn’t require more metal inputs.

[–] silence7 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

No, because coal, oil, and gas extraction are also mining activities. And those get used only once, whereas metals an such get used again and again and again. So there's a huge cut in total mining.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

Coal yes, but typically oil and gas are the drilling in “drilling and mining sector”.

[–] punkisundead 3 points 11 months ago

Also seems to be owning lots of animal farms, but somehow he doesnt care how that might impact the climate

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

idk shit about fuck on this guy but I can get behind the general spirit of executing profiteering, uh how did he put it? so-called people ;)

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

yeah I think he's trying to get ahead of the pack, like, "CAN YOU BELIEVE THESE MONSTERS!? LET'S GET THEM!"

[–] punkisundead 5 points 11 months ago

Can we put his head right next to the others?

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago