Music

7302 readers

28 users here now

Discussion about all things music, music production, and the music industry. Your own music is also acceptable here.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

cityboundforest@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

Whom@beehaw.org

HooGoesThere@beehaw.org

DJDarren@beehaw.org

Evolone@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

When, in your opinion, does a modern rock song expire into a classic rock song? (lemmy.studio)

submitted 11 months ago by favrion@lemmy.studio to c/music@beehaw.org

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A: 15 years B: 20 years C: 25 years D: 30 years E: 40 years F: 50 years G: other

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I’m almost afraid to answer this question.

The rock from the 60s and 70s got ubiquitously considered classic rock by the early 90s, but I wouldn’t classify anything beyond the early 80s as “classic”. I think that the genre may expand with time, but the 60s and 70s were the true origins of rock. The music past that is definitely not new, but not “classic”.

I guess that makes my answer G.

Edit: From a marketing perspective, I’m about to cringe hard, music up to the mid-90s is considered classic rock. To me that seems like it’s just an easy way to keep “classic rock” more entertaining and nostalgic for the older markets, and more relevant for the younger ones.

[–] Devi@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hear bands like Linkin Park referred to as classic rock quite a bit and that's early 2000's. I cringe every time someone says it.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

The thing is is that they're not quite wrong.

It's not quite right, but it will only become more true.

[–] GeekyOnion@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

This is a great point that it's more of a era or genera than a designator to be applied as the work ages. You have Rockabilly, Classic Rock, Grunge Rock, etc.

One of the things that makes music slightly different than durable goods, although I would have a hard time calling anything from the 90's "vintage," but it's getting close to that age.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

A big factor I feel is the artists themselves touring.

If the band has a hiatus, gets back together for a last tour, they're probably classic rock. If the band has a dead member and isn't replacing them, they're probably classic rock.

It's sad that Sublime, Alice in Chains, Linkin Park, and Soundgarden are all in this classic-rock-to-be state only because each band had so much life left in them. And well...

Now they're probably classic rock.

[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At this point any rock song the average person would recognize is classic rock. Rock in mainstream music hasn't been a thing for a long time.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, "classic rock" is more of a genre nowadays, rather than a certain period of time. "Modern rock" is anything that has the standard elements of rock music (i.e. distorted guitars, bass, drums), and if it sounds like the music of the "classic" era, then it's considered classic rock.

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

"Classic" is never an indicator of age, regardless of what type of media or whatever you're talking about. It basically just means that it is a great example of that category of thing and what makes that category unique.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If it was ever popular and not a current song in the genre of rock, it's a classic rock song. At least seemingly according to the radio industry.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

G: When the last of the Rolling Stones dies + 70 years.

I refuse to call "classic" anything that isn't in the public domain.