this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
70 points (97.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5294 readers
461 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To boil it down to a single set of bullet points, a group of billionaire investors

secretly bought up enough low–cost agricultural land to build a city that will make them obscenely richer when they sell and lease the resulting residential and commercial properties

used their ownership of parcels of land badly needed by the county to try to leverage the county into granting them the necessary permits and zoning changes

attempted to get the country to cover some of the cost to build pipes to supply water to the city they will profit from building

obtained the rights to that water by buying it from farmers who’ve had the market for their crops crash

and then, despite riling up county officials and local voters with their actions, tried to sell their project as a wonderfully generous social and environmental endeavor.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Sounds more like techno-feudalism to me

[–] millie 6 points 1 year ago

I honestly can't stand slowly scrolling and waiting for the text to appear. What a terrible design choice.

[–] andrewrgross 3 points 1 year ago

It's pretty tedious. I don't expect it to go anywhere.