this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
174 points (93.1% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5438 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pour one out for sunny, Reaganesque Republicanism.

The latest blow came this week, when Tim Scott, the second of two candidates with a future-focused, relentlessly positive message and a smiling disposition, dropped out of the GOP presidential primary. He was preceded to the exits by his fellow happy warrior Mike Pence. Both capitulated to an electorate more interested in candidates eager to violate Ronald Reagan’s Eleventh Commandment — thou shall not speak ill of any fellow Republican — shredding each other to make a point.

The last of their kind amid a field of slash-and-burn culture warriors and angry brawlers — candidates willing to call their political enemies “scum” and “vermin” — Pence and Scott had bet that there was a silent majority of Republican primary voters who wanted a return to an optimistic, whistle-while-you-work-the-base standard bearer.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 74 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Reagan, and Pence, treated people like scum and vermin. LGBTQ, immigrants, drug addicts, poor people, atheists... Their happy positivity only applied to wealthy Christians and the military industrial complex.

[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But they hate with a smile on their face!!

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Their mouths said they hated me, but their eyes... Well, their eyes said they hated me, too, but I really appreciated how much effort they put into working together in an attempt to discredit my right to live.

[–] Heidur@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Sounds like my new boss

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Reagan was a Patsy, it's very clear at this point he wasn't running himself let alone the government.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Regardless, he was the face and name of the administration. Some say he was a useful idiot, others say he was a two-faced mastermind. It doesn't matter, because the things done in his name under his watch set America on a path of self-implosion. He doesn't get a pass for being too stupid to stop it.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Reagan administration v Reagan, Reagan shit his pants and fought a wall, his administration did the actual presiding.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Ok, sure. Who cares? Does it make any functional difference? I never knew the man. I don't know anyone who knew the man. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you didn't know him either.

The man and the administration are one, as far as any citizen is concerned. Reagan was a shitty president. He was a shitty person. His wife was a shitty person. The policies his administration pursued were bad for America, and his leadership encouraged the worst of humanity.

Nobody is just one thing, though, and nobody does it all by themselves. Reagan might have been a stupid puppet, or he might have been the diabolical master. Either way, fuck him and fuck his administration. It makes absolutely no difference either way.

[–] HooPhuckenKarez@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

I heard Nancy was quite the cocksucker... In a good way.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I do know the Reagan family by chance but I held that belief out to that as well.

No, they aren't. This is how they escaped conviction for the whole Oliver North thing. Add yes we're in agreement it was a shitty administration.

Correct.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah... no shit... it's written right there, why act surprised?

thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow republican

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

was preceded to the exits by his fellow happy warrior Mike Pence

The guy who was so inanimate that a fly took up residence on his face during a debate?! Gtfo politico, stop trying to humanize these assholes

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

I want whatever they're smoking

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Pour one out for sunny, Reaganesque Republicanism.

Yep, those sunny people that laughed about the aids crisis. Man, such positivity...

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Whistle-while-you-lettheCIApoisonblackcommunities

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Iran contra, so hilarious. Everyone was practically giggling.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

"relentlessly positive"? I'm sorry, did I miss something, when have they ever had that? Is this piece written by a foreigner who's only ever seen out-of-context random sound bites of Republicans trying to sound positive... right before bringing the negativity?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 17 points 11 months ago

Republicans have been relentlessly positive? Trump has been calling Democrats "evil" and the press "the enemy of the people" for years now. Sure, we should note that Trump is using Nazi rhetoric verbatim, but we should note he's been doing it all along, not act as if it's new.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

Republicans havent had a positive message since the days of Lincoln freeing the slaves. And only because the parties eventually swapped.

Conservatives in the US have an unbroken lineage of utter disdain for humanity throughout American history.

[–] BustinJiber@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Is Politico one of those weird troll websites?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In hindsight it was kind of a self-destructive approach to politics. Win with positivity -> implement policies that steadily make life shitty for the average voter -> positivity no longer appeals to the average (republican) voter.

[–] TrismegistusMx 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"Relentless positivity" means denial. Once reality could no longer be denied (Obama era) the republicans attempted bargaining for a short time, and when that failed they resorted to anger. The ones who can't reach acceptance will become terrorists, if they're not already.