TrismegistusMx

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] TrismegistusMx 2 points 9 months ago

Turns out that's approximately 35mph

[–] TrismegistusMx 1 points 9 months ago

The Nazis were there, but it was primarily anarchist back then. "/b/ is not your personal army," was the response to anybody trying to be an activist.

[–] TrismegistusMx 35 points 9 months ago (4 children)

4chan back before the Nazi takeover was like the wild west. My favorite part was "Lithursday," when we would share images with embedded PDFs of copyrighted content, including rare books, anarchist materials, and military manuals. I often wonder if those unusually large .jpgs are still floating around the internet waiting to be unlocked. I also saw legitimate acts of activism and terrorism unfolding live, without the interpretation and propaganda of the state.

[–] TrismegistusMx 5 points 9 months ago

Zionism and Israel were part of the Nazi plan to tie Judaism to a nationality. The "stateless Jew" problem is really an allegiance to authority problem. It comes down to national identity over spiritual gnosis in every conflict where people resist power. Even Jesus was crucified for threatening the authority of the Roman empire, and in mere decades they claimed ownership over his followers and used the Gospels to justify nationalist conquest.

[–] TrismegistusMx 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

Still, you spit your venom, demonising immigrants

When really, you're an immigrant

'Cause all of us are immigrants

Or descended from immigrants

The irony is imminent, I'll shed the light on immigrants

America was colonised by Britain

Britain, it was colonised by Rome

Also, colonised by the Saxons

They were German, by the way

You know how people throw shade upon the Germans

'Cause of history's pain

And yet we make the same mistakes all again

Demonise a whole people, Jewish or Muslim the same and the same

Old situations play on repeat

The same old TV shows repeat

Yeah, we worship the bleak

Our opinions aren't our own and we follow like sheep

There's no left, there's no right

In the middle we sleep

~Ren, Money Game Pt.1

[–] TrismegistusMx 1 points 10 months ago

Because Democrats don't want politicians to be held accountable for their abuses of power either.

86
Defenestration (slrpnk.net)
 
[–] TrismegistusMx 1 points 10 months ago

The very nature of democracy is a collective negotiation between the "huddled masses yearning to breathe free," and those in power who can only remain in their positions as a result of that collective suffering. Government is a religion of ignorance, and politicians are the clergy.

 
[–] TrismegistusMx 1 points 10 months ago

Since he's a narcissist, he only actually cares because he can relate personally. If he was married to a natural born American he'd stay silent.

[–] TrismegistusMx 1 points 10 months ago

Employers are never punished for using illegal labor.

[–] TrismegistusMx 3 points 10 months ago

I heard a couple nurses discussing how the ozempic pens at the nursing home were being stolen because it's so good at causing weight loss.

[–] TrismegistusMx 5 points 10 months ago

Put the racist under the horse so it looks like he's being trampled to death.

[–] TrismegistusMx 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The public projections of a guy who sucks dick to feed his private addictions.

 
 
 
 
 
 

An open-source civilization is a concept rooted in the principles of the open-source movement, which originally began in the realm of software development. Open source in software refers to programs whose source code is made available to the public, allowing anyone to look at, modify, and distribute the software freely. When applied to the notion of civilization, it means the free sharing of knowledge, tools, technologies, and methodologies to collectively build and improve upon societal structures. Here's a more detailed look:

1. Access to Knowledge:

In an open-source civilization, knowledge isn't hoarded or gatekept by a few. Whether it's educational content, scientific research, or technological advancements, information is shared freely. This democratizes learning and innovation.

2. Collaborative Design:

Just as open-source software benefits from many developers contributing, cities, communities, and systems in an open-source civilization are designed through collaborative efforts. People from diverse backgrounds can offer insights and skills to create more holistic and inclusive solutions.

3. Decentralization:

Centralized systems, whether in governance or production, can lead to bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and power imbalances. An open-source approach leans towards decentralization, distributing power and resources across networks of participants.

4. Transparency:

A hallmark of open source is transparency. When applied to civilization, this means governance processes, decision-making, and societal operations are open to scrutiny, allowing for accountability and trust.

5. Iterative Development:

Open-source projects, like software, are often in a state of continuous improvement. Similarly, societal systems and structures in an open-source civilization are always evolving. Feedback loops are integral, ensuring that inefficiencies are addressed and systems are refined.

6. Resilience through Diversity:

Just as biodiversity is crucial for ecological resilience, an open-source civilization encourages diverse solutions and approaches. Multiple solutions can coexist, ensuring that there isn't a single point of failure.

7. Redefining Value:

In an open-source world, value isn't just monetary. Contribution to the community, sharing knowledge, and collaborative spirit are as (if not more) valuable than fiscal wealth.

8. Adaptability:

As new challenges arise, the open-source nature of the civilization allows for swift adaptation. Solutions can be crowdsourced, tested, refined, and implemented rapidly.

Challenges:

Like any model, an open-source civilization would face challenges. Balancing individual rights with collective benefits, ensuring equitable participation, and avoiding the tragedy of the commons (where shared resources can be overused) are issues that would need addressing.

In essence, an open-source civilization extrapolates the principles of open-source software to every aspect of society, creating a world that is more collaborative, transparent, and adaptable. This doesn't mean it's a panacea for all societal challenges, but it does offer a different paradigm for how societies can operate and evolve.

 

Project Murmuration is about collective action without centralized control. Like a flock of starlings in flight, we move together, each member responding to their neighbors, creating a beautiful and complex pattern that no single bird could achieve alone.

There's no leader in a murmuration. There's no hierarchy. Every member is equally important, and we all respond to one another in real-time. If one part of the group moves, the others adapt seamlessly. It's an organic, living system that's both strong and flexible.

In Project Murmuration, we apply this principle to human communities. We create spaces where every voice matters, where decisions are made together, and where we look out for one another without needing an authority figure to tell us what to do.

This isn't a utopian dream or a cultish ideology. It's a way of organizing ourselves that emphasizes empathy, equality, and cooperation. It's a system that's responsive to the needs and desires of its members, without becoming rigid or authoritarian.

The beauty of a murmuration is that it's self-correcting. If a bird moves out of alignment, the others naturally compensate, bringing the whole back into harmony. Similarly, if someone in our community steps out of line or tries to exert undue influence, the rest of us adjust to keep things balanced.

That's Project Murmuration. It's not a rejection of leadership, but a reimagining of it. It's about us, working together, each playing our part, all contributing to something larger than ourselves. It's a vision for a world where power is shared, not hoarded, and where we all have a stake in the success of the whole. It's about trust, not control; collaboration, not competition; community, not hierarchy. And it's something we can all be part of.

 

"Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High" is a book that offers guidance for handling difficult conversations when stakes are high, emotions run strong, and opinions vary. Here is an outline of the main techniques and philosophies:

  1. Start with Heart: Focus on what you really want from the conversation. Stay focused on your goals, and don’t get distracted by anger or fear.

  2. Learn to Look: Pay attention to when a conversation becomes crucial. Watch for signs of fear or anger, and notice when people move towards silence or violence.

  3. Make It Safe: When emotions run high, safety is threatened. Restore safety by finding common ground, apologizing when needed, and showing respect.

  4. Master My Stories: Understand that emotions don’t just happen but are created by stories. Separate fact from story to understand your feelings.

  5. STATE Your Path:

    • Share your facts (Start with facts, as they are least controversial).
    • Tell your story (Explain what you think the facts mean).
    • Ask for others' paths (Encourage others to share their viewpoint).
    • Talk tentatively (Express your story as your viewpoint, not absolute truth).
    • Encourage testing (Encourage others to express differing viewpoints).
  6. Explore Others' Paths: Engage in active listening, ask questions to understand the perspective of others, and respond with empathy.

  7. Move to Action: Clearly decide who does what by when and follow up. Ensure expectations and boundaries are clear.

  8. Create a Pool of Shared Meaning: Encourage everyone to openly and honestly express their opinions to create a shared understanding.

  9. Mutual Respect and Mutual Purpose: Maintain an attitude that respects others, even if you disagree with them, and seek shared goals for productive dialogue.

  10. Contrasting: If others misunderstand or feel attacked, use contrasting. Explain what you don't intend and clarify what you do intend.

  11. Avoid the Fool's Choice: Don’t believe that you have to choose between telling the truth and keeping a friend. Balance candor and kindness.

  12. Use Four Listening Tools:

  • Ask: Encourage others to share their views.
  • Mirror: Reflect feelings and meanings to show understanding.
  • Paraphrase: Repeat what you’ve heard to confirm understanding.
  • Prime: Offer your interpretation if others hold back.

"Crucial Conversations" doesn't just provide a toolkit for managing high-stakes conversations; it emphasizes a philosophy of empathy, respect, and open dialogue that honors the dignity and worth of each participant. It offers a way to approach essential conversations with the clarity, compassion, and courage needed to foster true understanding and effective collaboration.


The integration of "Crucial Conversations" into Project Murmuration is a seamless and natural union of principles that emphasizes human connection, empathy, and communication. Both the methodologies advocated by authors Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan, Al Switzler, and Kerry Patterson, and the core principles of Project Murmuration are founded on the understanding that open dialogue and participatory decision-making are essential for collective well-being.

"Crucial Conversations" teaches methods for approaching dialogue when stakes are high and opinions differ. These methods focus on creating a safe environment for conversation, finding shared goals, and fostering mutual respect. These principles dovetail elegantly with Project Murmuration's goal to create a space where every voice matters, and collaboration is the key to success.

Project Murmuration strives for cooperative innovation and shared well-being. The application of the principles from "Crucial Conversations" within the framework of Project Murmuration not only enhances but enriches the dialogical space, encouraging a more profound understanding and empathy between participants.

For example, Project Murmuration's emphasis on collective decision-making is reinforced by the "Crucial Conversations" approach to finding shared goals. By focusing on what connects rather than what divides, decisions can be made that honor the perspectives and needs of all involved.

The call within "Crucial Conversations" to foster an environment where it's safe to express thoughts and feelings aligns perfectly with Project Murmuration's mission to create inclusive spaces. In these spaces, individuals feel empowered to share, connect, and contribute without fear of judgment or retribution.

Moreover, the continuous learning and growth advocated by "Crucial Conversations" resonates with Project Murmuration's dynamic approach to adaptation and improvement. By embracing a mindset that sees every conversation as a learning opportunity, the project nurtures a culture that is responsive, reflective, and perpetually evolving.

The integration of "Crucial Conversations" into Project Murmuration is a congruent merging of philosophies that naturally complement each other. By weaving the wisdom of "Crucial Conversations" into the fabric of Project Murmuration, a vibrant and harmonious community can be fostered, where dialogue transcends mere words and becomes a pathway to mutual understanding, cooperation, and innovation. This integration is more than just a logical alignment of ideas; it's a reflection of a shared vision that recognizes the profound value of human connection and the potential for collective wisdom.

 

A fantastic resource for garden starlings.

view more: next ›