this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
482 points (91.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5683 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this important journalism? No way. Is it funny as shit? I think so.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 119 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I’d rather have media focus on his neonazi agenda

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We can walk and chew gum at the same time!

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

While waving a rainbow flag and flipping DeShitStain the bird.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's not that he's short. It's that he's so obviously lying and expecting to be believed.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's also the hypocrisy of banning drag while walking around in high heels every day.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Exactly. If he weren’t drawing so much attention to it, nobody would care. He’s not even that short.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Also, the argument that taller people get elected is a post hoc fallacy. Taller people live entirely different lives from short people. They grow up with simultaneously additional expectations and confidence. Tall children are treated as if they are more mature, more advanced, and more athletic. They're more likely to be eating well at home, getting exercise, and come from taller parents. The perception of maturity creates pressure to take advanced education classes, act as leaders among peers, and make decisions requiring authority, all advantages that compound across generations.

That doesn't mean a short person couldn't also experience the same advantageous upbringing due to the circumstances of their birth. It just means that, on average, society has a bias towards taller (but not too tall) people. Voters also have a slight bias towards taller candidates, but putting lifts in your shoes doesn't give you a lifetime of easy confidence and increased expectations. If anything, it reveals a sense of insecurity and inadequacy, not to mention brazen dishonesty.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. It's slightly amusing to see his insecurity laid bare, but really idgaf how tall he is. But I will say this is someone else who lies about pointless things so he will definitely lie about important things.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

No one gives a shit that he's short. We give a shit that someone that already has massive power, and is clutching for much more, is so ridiculously insecure and projects on people he should be responsible for, but instead targets them for harassment and worse. Insecurities play a big roll in bullying.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

I agree, but also this will effect a different group of voters. I wish all voters were educated and used logic, but many will just vote for the strong man. This guy who's insecure about his height and needs to wear heels to appear taller next to other people might lose some of those voters when they're made aware of it. Anyone who cares he's a fascist has already made up their mind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Won't call myself an expert but as my username suggests I'm also in the industry. If nothing else just looking at how he walks and stands is enough to tell he is lifting his shoes.

This being said I really hate that the media is fixating on the turds height insecurity and not the fact he is a mask-off authoritarian fascist that is trying to become president. It's like making fun of Hitler for his mustache, I mean it's kinda humorous but let's not let that distract from all the other more important shit

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I work for and teach for a University hospital located in the south, specializing in orthotics and prosthetics. I have built dozens of lifts for cowboy boots, mainly for people with severe limb length discrepancies.

He is 100 percent wearing a boot with around 3-4 inches of heel to ball internal lifts. The biggest giveaway in my opinion is that the boots are probably 2-3 sizes too big. The toe break in a normal shoe happens at the widest part of the shoe, you can tell his big toe is currently right where the first methead should be. This is why it looks like he's wearing genie shoes, the shoe is breaking closer to the toe box because there's nothing in them to prevent them bending backwards. .

Now if he wasn't wearing lifts he wouldn't be able to keep them on, as cowboy boots require a tight fitting vamp to stay attached. The lift raises the heels and thus the dorsum of the foot to press tightly against the vamp of an oversized boot.

The biggest thing I see that the article missed is that you can tell he is in hindfoot varus. Which is generally what happens when you do a sustained heel raise, enable to occasionally offload the posterior tibial tendon, moving some of the load to the peroneal tendon. This is why his foot is rolling over the lateral aspect of the boot.

This could occur naturally, but it's pretty rare outside of people who were born with clubbing in their feet. So I looked for other pictures of him walking in different shoes and found a pair of him walking in rain boots. In that picture he was over pronating and running over the medial side. So it's safe to assume that the supination in the boots are not a naturally acquired deformity.

If it makes anyone feel better, this guy is in some serious pain anytime he wears his lift. If he hasn't already done so, he looks like he's not to far away from a Jones fracture in his left foot. The left side looks like he's about 5-7 degrees of extra hindfoot varus than his right, which usually means he's damaged his peroneal tendon, or where it attaches to at the base of the fifth tarsal bone.

[–] eee@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I love that I can find a expert who can jump on with their professional views on a random topic here haha. Cool!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] halferect@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think having a laugh at him hurts him more with his base because that is something republican voters care about, the authoritarian facisism is a plus to republican voters so media focusing on his book banning or taking on Disney for LGBT stuff only shows things Republicans like and want more of but a short loser who needs heels to just make it to 5 11 is a big no vote. And the 24 hour news cycle has covered his fascist shit pretty well.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I guess this is true... Sadly

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Now do Trump. (He's gone from 5 feet 10 decades ago to "6 feet 3 inches" now, and that's not all his bouffant.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Heels. He's wearing high heels. Remember, it's projection.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tedrow@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a fragile human being. I have nothing more to add.

[–] Furimbus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I will add that the whole thing makes me think of this now whenever I see him:

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Can we be certain that it's for boosting height and not the perkiness of his buttocks?

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Love the double standard

Women = heels Men = height boosters

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It would be one thing if it were just the heel

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They're gender-affirming appliances when they're not for looks.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

What’s hilarious is that heels started as a military thing- men who were cavalry would wear them so their feet wouldn’t slip through stirrups as easily.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

I first saw them called heels a while ago. However, it's specifically because he's insecure about his height, so they're height boosters in particular. They aren't for style like heels typically are.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

So high heels. Gateway fashion to trans.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Trump has started a cargo cult.

They're all trying to replace him now, using stupid things that they think worked for Trump. Making themselves look taller while leaning forward at an unnatural angle, saying horrendous shit, being generally despicable and having no filter required for the top job.

Trump got popular because people knew him. He was a celebrity. TV shows and shit. People are dumb as fuck and vote for people they've heard of. You could put Dolly Parton up there right now and get 60% of the popular vote.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Dolly Parton is a decent human being so there's no chance she'd make it that far in politics.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

She would actually give a crap about children's literacy so let's do that.

[–] technicalogical@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dolly is a gigantic supporter of libraries and books in general. She couldn’t get 60% of the vote because Republicans hate her.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Tangentially related, but more men should be openly rocking some heels. Make heeled boots fashionable again.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then there's me, drooling over the pair of zero-drop Jim Green African Ranger boot. We each got our thing, I guess. Free the men from footwear oppression!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tylith@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trust me, no one will notice

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Another example of how the cons are the biggest snowflakes - this headline in addition to the one about donnie's small "hands", again.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

He has nothing but my disgust, but his poor toes have my pity.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Enough fucking desantis spam. This cunt is of no consequence outside of FL.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The only person denying this is the short man himself right?

load more comments
view more: next ›