this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
94 points (89.8% liked)

politics

19103 readers
4328 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Highlights: The promotional tactics that gun manufacturers and sellers use with social media, video games, and other entertainment are the focus of a new report from Sandy Hook Promise, the gun-violence prevention group led by parents of children killed in the elementary school massacre 11 years ago in Newtown, Connecticut. The report, “Untargeting Kids,” highlights how the gun industry shifted away from a longstanding culture of safety and responsibility to cultivate a market of young consumers—a demographic inundated with social media and uniquely vulnerable, according to researchers, to provocative and seductive messaging.

Social media companies have banned the direct sales of guns on their platforms, but that doesn’t stop the firearms industry from promoting or amplifying gun content from high-profile figures. One example cited in the report is a January 2020 Instagram post from gun manufacturer Daniel Defense that features a photo of music star Post Malone showing off one of its AR-15-style rifles, the MK18, while standing in front of a bar stocked with liquor.

The gun industry has favored aggressive marketing for more than a decade, as companies realized that vast profits could be made from the increasingly popular AR-15-style rifles.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Mother Jones: these ads are killing people

Also Mother Jones: please disable your adblocker

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"One example cited in the report is a January 2020 Instagram post from gun manufacturer Daniel Defense that features a photo of music star Post Malone showing off one of its AR-15-style rifles, the MK18, while standing in front of a bar stocked with liquor."

Post Malone, guns, and liquor... what about that says "advertising to kids"? p.s. Forget the AR, check out that Thompson over the bar...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The liquor and tobacco industries have been targeting children for decades. I'm surprised this is even something people aren't aware of. Yes, showing kids a big music star with guns and liquor works on them.

[–] freeindv@monyet.cc 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] freeindv@monyet.cc 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Complete bullshit. Just because they make the politically driven accusations and affix a "science" brand on it doesn't make it any less of an agenda driven lie.

Now go back to eating your bland, textureless soylant like an adult. Nobody likes flavors except kids, and I'm glad for them to have been banned across the board to protect us from those evil corporations

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no idea why you think tobacco companies don't advertise to kids when they've literally been found guilty in court of doing so. But I guess the tobacco industry only has our best interests at heart.

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hell, my father received a pack of Camels in the mail on his 16th birthday directly from the company (mid-70s). He wound up smoking camels for roughly 20 years before finally kicking the addiction.

A Businesses will do all they can to expand their consumer base and find new ways to get existing consumers to spend more money on their products. If the fines are less than the increased sales, it's just the cost of accessing that market.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I really doubt kids are listening to Post Malone.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

hate your teacher? Glock understands.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's noticeable to the point of being annoying in the general YouTube shorts algorithm.

[–] MagicPterodactyl@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every once in a while I'll flip through a few YouTube shorts and every time I eventually get frustrated by how much gun content I'm served. I've never willingly clicked on a YouTube video about guns but Google seems to think that is all I want to see. Most of what I watch is about old computers, engineering and gardening.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll never figure my YouTube selections. The vast majority of my YouTube use is gun related. Maybe looking at tutorials for gunsmithing a particular thing, or just to hear Gun Jesus school me on history, or maybe Paul Harrell has a cool looking new demonstration.

Any yet I get about zero right-wing, nutcase conspiracy bullshit. Not even right leaning guntubers. And the videos that aren't about guns, and there are plenty, speak to my interests. I can go all night hoping from one suggestion to the other.

Given what everyone else has said, it's really weird it works for me.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Realistically, "the algorithm" is just an elaborate "people who like A also like B so here is a video popular with B watchers", so it can't be too difficult to manipulate.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

Ad funded mobile games are fucking stuffed with gun based shitty games. I’ve gotten quite good at counting to 30 seconds in my head without having to watch they garbage.

[–] GardeningSadhu@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

See, violent video games DO affect children negatively. It's incredibly obvious that this is true, i don't care that people can cite studies that say otherwise.