this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
233 points (95.3% liked)

Privacy

31284 readers
728 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

if they outright forced us to stop day one there'd be outrage, so they instead ease us in. first a popup, then a timed popup, slowly leading to their actual goal but without the risk of an initial outrage. i know this is an extreme comparison but we're like lambs to a slaughter

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kindness@lemmy.ml 96 points 11 months ago (2 children)

My blind guess is they are doing split testing with various ad-blocking measures.

Whenever someone interacts with the message, they know the popup worked. Best reaction is currently to use uBlock Origin's element picker or zapper to hide the popup.

The company is likely gathering data in various blocking methods to see which is the most foolproof.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This is similar to what viruses do to determine if they're on a real computer instead or just a sandbox. Most antiviruses will run an unfamiliar program in a sandbox (virtual machine) and if it starts doing malware things, flags it and sends it to quarantine. One known weakness of these sandboxes is that they cannot interact with the program, so a lot of viruses will put their payload behind a window. Any interaction with the window will signal to the virus that it's on a real computer and it will deliver the payload, otherwise it will keep quiet to stay under the radar.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Thank you. I'd forgotten that uBlock had the zapper function

[–] JSens1998@lemmy.ml 52 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I started getting the popups recently. Tried blocking the elements with uBlock, but in turn it would pause the video 2 seconds in. Pretty annoying. So I said screw it and installed an extension that would redirect the youtube watch page to an Invidious instance. Might as well make the transition now before they completely block adblockers for good. Screw Google!

[–] Rearsays@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bebo@literature.cafe 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What extension do you use to redirect youtube page?

[–] JelleLa@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Not the original commenter , but I'd think is Libredirect

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JSens1998@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Tampermonkey along with this userscript. Works a charm!

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I'll be a bit sad if YT becomes unwatchable without blocking ads but I'll get over it and watch something else somewhere else. Same as I did with Reddit.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'll be a bit sad if YT becomes unwatchable without blocking ads

YT has been unwatchable without blocking ads for years now.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I disabled all extensions while trying to fight against that pop-up and I realized YouTube is almost unwatchable even with adblocker if you don't have sponsor block. How someone can sit thru the ads and sponsored sections just blows my mind. As if sitting on youtube watching videos isn't already waste of your time enough.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well you can just skip over the sponsors manually, I did it for ages before discovering SponsorBlock. Nowhere near as bad as unskippable ads.

Plus there are the occasional Youtubers that will actually do entertaining sponsor reads, whereas YouTube ads are always unbearable. Haven't seen one on my own devices in... Well, I think I was running adblockers before the creation of YouTube. Pour one out for "The Proxomitron", ancient ancestor of today's adblockers.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The only Youtuber I know who shills his sponsors in really funny, creative ways is Jay Foreman - and specifically in the Map Men videos he does with his pal Mark Cooper Jones. He puts actual time and effort to make the fucking plugs amusing to watch (and I suspect he also sells his own talents as a comedian at the same time).

I watch his plugs. I'll never buy anything from the motherfucking advertisers who pay him but I sure watch him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] probablyaCat@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Umm I don't think they care. They have a monopoly on amateur video hosting and only make money off of it with ads. If you are watching without ads or premium then you are costing them money. They do not care about your outrage. This isn't reddit where it might have caused a long term permanent degradation to their content, the people posting stuff want you to pay or have ads as well. Users do not act as moderators or content providers (I mean I'm sure most content providers are users as well but they want ad revenue). They have just ignored ad blocking for long enough to get monopolies in their areas (browser, YouTube) and are now getting rid of that problem. I'm honestly amazed at how they took over the browser market. Almost everything is chromium based now. Even email. They may not have a monopoly, but they certainly made themselves the standard.

Tldr: they aren't doing it slow for fear of outrage. They did it slow to get a monopoly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (4 children)
[–] Astaroth@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Well just look at the youtube sub on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/1792um0/let_that_sink_in_before_you_defend_a_billion/

99% of comments are youtube apologists

 

Hopefully most of those are bot comments & the mods are probably youtube employees

[–] Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Looks like astroturfing to me

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

No offense, but you went to a subreddit that's likely to have people who enjoy google products and because of that are less likely to be critical even when they don't agree with the company. Have you looked at the r/technology subreddit posts about this issue? Or r/privacy or any of the other subreddits that might give a better view?

This is like going to the apple subreddit to find out if people are outraged bout the price of iPhones.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 11 months ago

I would call it pretty fast, I got the popup for the first time less than a month ago and I already rely on the magic uBlock does to even be able to watch YouTube.

[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I got the pop ups for a while, then they went away. They are back again. Fortunately I am still able to ignore it and not see any adds. If there is a time where I am forced to watch adds, it will hurt, but I will give up YouTube. I hope others give it up and don't cave if it comes to that.

[–] Retiring@lemmy.ml 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I gave up reddit the day apollo stopped working and I will quit youtube the day I have to see any ads whatsoever. It just frees up time to do other, more fulfilling, things.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

What, you mean that clicking "not interested" in the fourteenth WW2 documentary in a row about "What if the nazis won" isn't fulfilling??

[–] chillsmeit@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The solution is to use Firefox or even better librewolf with uBlock. If you already have these, purge the filters cache and then update it back again. If you still have problems with this after doing these steps, there's probably some extension conflicting with it or an extra manual filter you added. Cheers

[–] turbonewbe@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It's a privacy oriented fork of Firefox. Removes telemetry, pocket button, sync to cloud, etc.

https://librewolf.net/

This project is a custom and independent version of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy, security and user freedom.

LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM.

[–] turbonewbe@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Can those settings be disabled in firefox but are not as default?

Sorry for ly aweful English.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bouh@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

At some point YouTube kind of block your account with the message instead of the video.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gnorv@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

FreeTube still works flawlessly.

[–] hottari@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You are goddamn right about that one. Though I think Youtube is being petty with this war against adblockers, none of the major browsers block Youtube ads by default afaik.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

10 million on uBlock alone, easy to see how thats a huge untapped market

[–] hottari@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

Sure. A huge untapped market of people who don't want anything to do with VPN ads.

[–] Shaul@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How can YouTube interfer with adblockers in Firefox/Librewolf/IceCat?

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 44 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Client side web DRM is coming, which is why Google makes browsers and OSs now.

Adblock will be prohibited for “security”.

[–] DivergentHarmonics@sopuli.xyz 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Relevant link: https://interpeer.io/blog/2023/07/google-vs-the-open-web/
Bottom line: Google want to introduce a live certification process for web clients so that webservers can potentially discriminate against specific configurations.

@Shaul@lemmy.ca

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›