Privacy

31284 readers

612 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

233

what youtube is doing is a slow easing of removing adblockers rather than an immediate one (lemmy.ml)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by jackpot@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

if they outright forced us to stop day one there'd be outrage, so they instead ease us in. first a popup, then a timed popup, slowly leading to their actual goal but without the risk of an initial outrage. i know this is an extreme comparison but we're like lambs to a slaughter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] probablyaCat@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Umm I don't think they care. They have a monopoly on amateur video hosting and only make money off of it with ads. If you are watching without ads or premium then you are costing them money. They do not care about your outrage. This isn't reddit where it might have caused a long term permanent degradation to their content, the people posting stuff want you to pay or have ads as well. Users do not act as moderators or content providers (I mean I'm sure most content providers are users as well but they want ad revenue). They have just ignored ad blocking for long enough to get monopolies in their areas (browser, YouTube) and are now getting rid of that problem. I'm honestly amazed at how they took over the browser market. Almost everything is chromium based now. Even email. They may not have a monopoly, but they certainly made themselves the standard.

Tldr: they aren't doing it slow for fear of outrage. They did it slow to get a monopoly.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Premium absolutely does not cost them money fwiw, it wouldn't exist if it did, they aren't that stupid.

[–] TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

You misread their post.

If you are watching without ads or premium then you are costing them money.

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The youtube thing is an annoyance. The one that's REAL concerning is what happens when Google eventually forces Firefox out of the market by convincing everyone to build their websites in such a way as to only run on Chromium based browsers. I mean, American Anti-Trust laws are just completely fucking gutted, so it's not like there will be any consequence to them doing that. But once they do, they'll have a veritable monopoly on the internet. At least the internet most people interact with.